Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: Union Seventy Partnership, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Mark Twain Bank, Defendant/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/union-seventy-partnership-et-al-plaintiffsappellants-v-mark-twain-bank-de-13627
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13627
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=Union+Seventy+Partnership%2C+et+al.%2C+Plaintiffs%2FAppellants%2C+v.+Mark+Twain+Bank%2C+Defendant%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=20&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 20; evidence: tag: criminal-law)
- Corporate Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/corporate?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=corporate&ott_archive_query=Union+Seventy+Partnership%2C+et+al.%2C+Plaintiffs%2FAppellants%2C+v.+Mark+Twain+Bank%2C+Defendant%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=text&ott_archive_link_score=6&ott_archive_link_evidence=text%3A+partnership&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: corporate; source: text; score: 6; evidence: text: partnership)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  Union Seventy Partnership, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. Mark Twain Bank, Defendant/Respondent.
Case Number:  73773
Handdown Date:  10/27/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Robert H. Dierker, Jr.
Counsel for Appellant:  Rexford H. Caruthers and Steven Dyer
Counsel for Respondent:  E. Michael Murphy and Henry F. Luepke
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  R. Dowd, C.J., Crandall and Ahrens, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
Plaintiffs, Union Seventy Partnership, et al., appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment in favor of 
defendant, Mark Twain Bank, in an action for breach of contract and misrepresentation.
We have reviewed the record on appeal and find that no error of law appears.   An opinion would have no 
precedential value.  However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum opinion for their information only, 
setting forth the reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed.  Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.