Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: William Poynter, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/william-poynter-movantappellant-v-state-of-missouri-defendantrespondent-13123
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=13123
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=William+Poynter%2C+Movant%2FAppellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Defendant%2FRespondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=24&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 24; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  William Poynter, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.
Case Number:  72646
Handdown Date:  03/31/1998
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of Warren County, Hon. Edward D. Hodge
Counsel for Appellant:  Deborah B. Wafer and Susan McGraugh
Counsel for Respondent:  John M. Morris, III, and Cristi A. Ingalsbe
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.  Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and J. Dowd, J.J., concur.
Opinion:
ORDER
William Poynter, movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary 
hearing. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and find the motion court's judgment is not clearly 
erroneous.  Rule 24.035(k).  An extended opinion would have no precedential value.  We have, however, prepared a 
memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only.  We affirm the judgment 
pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.