Ott Law Firm Agent-Safe Plain Text
Official source remains authoritative.

Case: William Willingham, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Decision Date: Unknown
Outcome: affirmed
Practice Area: criminal-law
Canonical URL: https://ott.law/missouri-courts/opinions/william-willingham-appellant-v-state-of-missouri-respondent-12642
Official Source URL: https://www.courts.mo.gov/file.jsp?id=12642
Related Practice Areas:
- Criminal Law: https://ott.law/practice-areas/criminal-law?ott_archive=missouri-courts&ott_archive_practice_area=criminal-law&ott_archive_query=William+Willingham%2C+Appellant%2C+v.+State+of+Missouri%2C+Respondent.&ott_archive_link_source=tag&ott_archive_link_score=24&ott_archive_link_evidence=tag%3A+criminal-law%3B+text%3A+state+of+missouri&ott_archive_location=opinion_plain_text_practice_area (slug: criminal-law; source: tag; score: 24; evidence: tag: criminal-law, text: state of missouri)

---
## Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Opinion
Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District
Case Style:  William Willingham, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.
Case Number:  71853
Handdown Date:  11/25/1997
Appeal From:  Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. James Hartenbach
Counsel for Appellant:  Dave Hemingway
Counsel for Respondent:  Lisa Fischer
Opinion Summary: 
None
Citation: 
Opinion Author:  PER CURIAM
Opinion Vote:  AFFIRMED.   Ahrens, P. J., Crandall, Jr., and Karohl, JJ., concur.
Opinion:
O R D E R 
Defendant, William Willingham, appeals from the judgment denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 
24.035 motion.  The judgment of the trial court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous.  No error of law 
appears.  An opinion would have no precedential value.
     The judgment is affirmed Rule 84.16(b).
Separate Opinion:
None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.