Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

see state v primm 347 sw3d 66

This authority appears in 4 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:see-state-v-primm-347-sw3d-66
Citation Sample
See State v. Primm, 347 S.W.3d 66
Cases Shown
4
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to see state v primm 347 sw3d 66?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free Criminal Law ConsultationCall About A Criminal Law Claim

Citation Treatment

cited

4

Cases Citing see state v primm 347 sw3d 66

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Supreme Court of Missouri / Jan 13, 2026

Craig M. Wood, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.

cited

Citation: See State v. Primm, 347 S.W.3d 66

Craig Wood appealed the overruling of his Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief challenging his first-degree murder conviction and death sentence for the 2014 abduction and murder of 10-year-old Hailey Owens. The court affirmed the motion court's judgment, finding no ineffective assistance of counsel or other grounds for postconviction relief warranting reversal of Wood's conviction and sentence.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation