St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

state v drewel 835 sw2d 494

This authority appears in 22 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:state-v-drewel-835-sw2d-494
Citation Sample
State v. Drewel, 835 S.W.2d 494
Cases Shown
22
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to state v drewel 835 sw2d 494?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

22

Cases Citing state v drewel 835 sw2d 494

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Mar 10, 2026

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.

cited

Citation: State v. Drewel, 835 S.W.2d 494

McGregory appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the third degree and property damage in the second degree, raising unpreserved claims of error regarding evidence admissibility and the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund judgment amount. The court affirmed the convictions but modified the CVC judgment amount, finding the trial court entered a judgment in excess of that authorized by law.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation