St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Case Authority

state v walkup 220 sw3d 748

This authority appears in 40 citation records in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive.

Canonical ID
case:state-v-walkup-220-sw3d-748
Citation Sample
State v. Walkup, 220 S.W.3d 748
Cases Shown
40
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to cases citing this authority

These links route legal-research traffic from this authority profile into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the authority itself or the cited cases map to a practical client issue.

Criminal LawCivil LitigationFamily Law

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help with an issue tied to state v walkup 220 sw3d 748?

This authority profile is public case-law research. If the authority connects to your claim or dispute, Ott Law Firm can help evaluate evidence, deadlines, and next steps.

Free ConsultationCall Ott Law Firm

Citation Treatment

cited

38

distinguished

1

followed

1

Cases Citing state v walkup 220 sw3d 748

Showing up to 50 opinion records linked to this authority.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Feb 10, 2026

Daniel T. Williams, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

cited

Citation: State v. Walkup, 220 S.W.3d 748

The court affirmed the denial of post-conviction relief where appellant claimed ineffective assistance of counsel for trial counsel's failure to investigate his mental state. The appellant failed to establish how additional mental state information would have aided his defense or satisfied the prejudice requirement for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.

Criminal LawCivil Litigation