BETTY McCRACKEN, Respondent, vs. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, Appellant.
Decision date: June 24, 2013SD32368
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
BETTY McCRACKEN, ) ) Respondent, ) ) vs. ) No. SD32368 ) DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, ) FILED: June 24, 2013 ) Appellant. )
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF BARRY COUNTY Honorable Robert J. Foulke, Judge REVERSED
A physician advised the Director of Revenue that Betty McCracken, age 82, no longer could drive safely. 1 The Director notified Ms. McCracken that her driving privilege would be revoked unless she offered contrary evidence. She did not comply and her license was revoked.
1 The report stated in pertinent part: I am the primary care physician for the above referenced Betty McCracken. It is my medical opinion that due to chronic and irreversible medical conditions, she is no longer safely able to operate a motor vehicle. State law contemplates and authorizes such reports notwithstanding any physician- patient privilege. See § 302.291.3 & .4 RSMo, as amended through 2011.
She successfully petitioned the circuit court to set aside the revocation, alleging that the Director lacked "good cause" to believe Ms. McCracken could not safely operate a motor vehicle. The Director appeals. Our review is de novo. "Whether the Director's determination of good cause had an adequate basis is a question of law." Leaton v. Director of Revenue, 187 S.W.3d 894, 896 (Mo.App. 2006). We reverse. Under case law and by statute, the Director may rely on a physician's report setting forth facts "from which a reasonable person could believe that [the Director] should exercise the discretion granted by section 302.291." Leaton, 187 S.W.3d at 896; see also § 302.291.3. "Under the statute, as a matter of law, good cause exists where the record contains a report from a law enforcement officer, physician or family member stating that the driver cannot safely operate a motor vehicle." Leaton, 187 S.W.3d at 897 (our emphasis). Leaton supports the Director's claim of good cause for her action. We are offered no argument to the contrary. 2 Judgment reversed.
DANIEL E. SCOTT, P.J. — OPINION AUTHOR JEFFREY W. BATES, J. — CONCURS DON E. BURRELL, C.J. — CONCURS
2 Ms. McCracken did not file a brief on appeal. There is no penalty for this, but we do not benefit from any arguments she might have made.
Related Opinions
In re: Brian Todd Goldstein, Respondent.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 23, 2026#SC101182
The Missouri Supreme Court found that attorney Brian Todd Goldstein violated professional conduct rules by mishandling client funds and engaging in dishonest conduct, including taking clients without informing his law firm, misrepresenting trust account practices, and misappropriating over $585,000 from more than 100 clients. The Court ordered Goldstein disbarred based on violations of rules governing safekeeping of property and dishonest conduct.
In re: Mark W. Arensberg, Respondent.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 13, 2026#SC101157
Attorney Arensberg was disciplined for knowingly drafting fraudulent loan documents to diminish a client's son's marital estate during divorce proceedings. Rather than the agreed-upon reprimand, the court imposed an indefinite suspension with a six-month waiting period for reinstatement, stayed pending successful completion of one-year probation.
Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services vs. Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#WD87223
Motors Insurance Corporation vs. Autobot Towing, LLC(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictJuly 8, 2025#WD87590
JAMES SANCHEZ, in his capacity as President of INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 702, KEITH ATCHISON, in his capacity as Vice-President of INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL UNION 702, and QUINTON TILLMAN, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. CITY OF POPLAR BLUFF, MISSOURI, Defendant-Respondent(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictMay 28, 2025#SD38656