Brian Thomason, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Brian Thomason, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent Case Number: 73178 Handdown Date: 09/29/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of City of St. Louis, Hon. Thomas C. Grady Counsel for Appellant: Dave Hemingway Counsel for Respondent: Kenneth P. Ferguson Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. J. Dowd, P.J., Crahan and Teitelman, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Brian Thomason (Movant) filed a Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after he pleaded guilty to several charges in two separate cases. The motion court denied his motion without a hearing. Movant appeals from this judgment, arguing he is entitled to a hearing on his two claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's determination is not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.