Curtiss Canaday, Appellant, v. Alliedsignal, Inc., Respondent.
Decision date: Unknown
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Curtiss Canaday, Appellant, v. Alliedsignal, Inc., Respondent. Case Number: 54483 Handdown Date: 03/24/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. Thomas C. Clark Counsel for Appellant: Party Acting Pro Se Counsel for Respondent: David Sosinski Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Lowenstein, P.J., Breckenridge and Hanna, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Plaintiff, Curtiss Canaday filed a suit for damages pursuant to Section 287.780 against an employer for wrongful discharge, allegedly, in retaliation for filing a worker's compensation suit. The defendant, AlliedSignal, filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that an arbitrator's award in its favor collaterally estopped Canaday's claim. The trial court granted defendant's motion and the plaintiff's appeal followed. We affirm. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
AIG Agency, Inc., d/b/a Associated Insurance Group, Appellant, vs. Missouri General Insurance Agency, Inc., Jim Baxendale and Mitch O'Brien, Respondents.(2015)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictNovember 3, 3015#ED102096
Christopher Hanshaw, Appellant, vs. Crown Equipment Corp., et al., Respondents.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101091
In re: Brian Todd Goldstein, Respondent.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 23, 2026#SC101182
Mouna Apperson, f/k/a Nicholas Apperson, Appellant, vs. Natasha Kaminsky, et al., Respondents.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 23, 2026#SC101020
In re: Mark W. Arensberg, Respondent.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 13, 2026#SC101157