OTT LAW

David Chick, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: David Chick, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 73146 Handdown Date: 04/21/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Monroe County, Hon. Ronald R. McKenzie Counsel for Appellant: Gary Brotherton Counsel for Respondent: Daniel G. Cierpiot Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Karohl, J.J., concur. Opinion: O R D E R David B. Chick, Movant, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. Movant pleaded guilty to four counts of forgery (Counts I & II in Cause No. CR796-209FX and Counts I & II in Cause No. CR796-253FX) in violation of section 570.090, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and concluded the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). A published opinion would have no precedential value and we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b)(2). We have provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only. Judgment affirmed. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions