David Perkins-Bey, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: David Perkins-Bey, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. Case Number: 73470 Handdown Date: 08/18/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Paul McGhee Counsel for Appellant: Mark A. Grothoff Counsel for Respondent: Karen L. Kramer Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. J. Dowd, P.J., Crahan and Teitelman, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER David Perkins-Bey (Movant) appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without a hearing. Movant's convictions for first degree robbery, section 569.020, RSMo 1994, and armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 1994, were affirmed on appeal in State v. Perkins, 945 S.W.2d 43 (Mo. App. E.D. 1997). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the trial court's decision is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.