Diana L. Johnson, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Defendant-Appellant.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Defendant-
- Respondent
- Diana L. Johnson, Plaintiff-
Disposition
Mixed outcome
- {"type":"reversed","scope":null}
- {"type":"remanded","scope":null}
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Case Style: Diana L. Johnson, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Defendant- Appellant. Case Number: 28615 Handdown Date: 11/13/2007 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Phelps County, Hon. Tracy L. Storie Counsel for Appellant: Nicole L. Loethen Counsel for Respondent: Brendon J. Fox Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: REVERSED AND REMANDED. All concur. Opinion: The Director of Revenue appeals a judgment of the circuit court of Phelps County ordering the director to reinstate the driving privileges of Diana Johnson which were revoked pursuant to section 577.041, RSMo 2000. This court reverses and remands. The director filed a motion asking this court to remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on the record. From the trial court's docket sheets and judgment, it can be discerned that a hearing was held and evidence presented; yet a letter from the court reporter indicates that no record of the hearing was made. Ms. Johnson asserts that a transcript is unnecessary for our determination on appeal because "[t]he only evidence put forth in the entire case was the Exhibit A submitted by the Director."
From the documents presented, it is unclear whether Exhibit A was the only evidence. Because it is unclear what evidence the trial court had before it, this court may not speculate on the evidentiary basis for the trial court's decision. Roberts v. Director of Revenue, 959 S.W.2d 949, 950 (Mo.App. 1998); Wolansky v. Director of Revenue, 936 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Mo.App. 1996). "Nonexistence of the transcript of the trial precludes appellate review and requires that the judgment of the trial court be reversed and remanded to permit the parties to try the case with a proper record." Silman v. Director of Revenue, 914 S.W.2d 832 (Mo.App. 1996); see also, Holt v. Director of Revenue, 926 S.W.2d 532, 533 (Mo.App. 1996); Koehr v. Director of Revenue, 813 S.W.2d 363, 364 (Mo.App. 1991). The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial on the record. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 577.041cited
section 577.041, RSMo
Cases
- holt v director of revenue 926 sw2d 532cited
Holt v. Director of Revenue, 926 S.W.2d 532
- koehr v director of revenue 813 sw2d 363cited
Koehr v. Director of Revenue, 813 S.W.2d 363
- roberts v director of revenue 959 sw2d 949cited
Roberts v. Director of Revenue, 959 S.W.2d 949
- silman v director of revenue 914 sw2d 832cited
Silman v. Director of Revenue, 914 S.W.2d 832
- wolansky v director of revenue 936 sw2d 578cited
Wolansky v. Director of Revenue, 936 S.W.2d 578
Related Opinions
Other opinions in the same practice area.
Rodney Lee Lincoln, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2014)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 2, 2104#ED100987
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080
McGregory appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the third degree and property damage in the second degree, raising unpreserved claims of error regarding evidence admissibility and the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund judgment amount. The court affirmed the convictions but modified the CVC judgment amount, finding the trial court entered a judgment in excess of that authorized by law.
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. RUSSELL KENNETH CLANCY, Appellant(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictFebruary 25, 2026#SD38782
The court affirmed Clancy's conviction for second-degree assault against a special victim after a jury trial. The evidence was sufficient to prove that Clancy punched an elderly civilian in the face and struck a police officer during an altercation at a laundromat, supporting the conviction under Missouri statute § 565.052.3.
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. James Willis Peters, Appellant.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101218
James Willis Peters appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, challenging whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all four of his prior offenses were intoxication-related traffic offenses. The court found the state failed to sufficiently prove his 2002 offense was an IRTO and therefore vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Elizabeth M. Speer, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED113172
The court reversed defendant's convictions for second-degree property damage and fourth-degree assault because the trial court failed to conduct an adequate Faretta hearing and failed to ensure a written waiver of counsel was entered prior to trial, as required by Missouri law. Although the defendant did not preserve the issue by objecting at trial, the court found the error must be reviewed because the failure to conduct a proper Faretta hearing is a constitutional violation that cannot be waived.