OTT LAW

Diana L. Johnson, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Defendant-Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Case Style: Diana L. Johnson, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Defendant- Appellant. Case Number: 28615 Handdown Date: 11/13/2007 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Phelps County, Hon. Tracy L. Storie Counsel for Appellant: Nicole L. Loethen Counsel for Respondent: Brendon J. Fox Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: REVERSED AND REMANDED. All concur. Opinion: The Director of Revenue appeals a judgment of the circuit court of Phelps County ordering the director to reinstate the driving privileges of Diana Johnson which were revoked pursuant to section 577.041, RSMo 2000. This court reverses and remands. The director filed a motion asking this court to remand the case to the trial court for a hearing on the record. From the trial court's docket sheets and judgment, it can be discerned that a hearing was held and evidence presented; yet a letter from the court reporter indicates that no record of the hearing was made. Ms. Johnson asserts that a transcript is unnecessary for our determination on appeal because "[t]he only evidence put forth in the entire case was the Exhibit A submitted by the Director."

From the documents presented, it is unclear whether Exhibit A was the only evidence. Because it is unclear what evidence the trial court had before it, this court may not speculate on the evidentiary basis for the trial court's decision. Roberts v. Director of Revenue, 959 S.W.2d 949, 950 (Mo.App. 1998); Wolansky v. Director of Revenue, 936 S.W.2d 578, 579 (Mo.App. 1996). "Nonexistence of the transcript of the trial precludes appellate review and requires that the judgment of the trial court be reversed and remanded to permit the parties to try the case with a proper record." Silman v. Director of Revenue, 914 S.W.2d 832 (Mo.App. 1996); see also, Holt v. Director of Revenue, 926 S.W.2d 532, 533 (Mo.App. 1996); Koehr v. Director of Revenue, 813 S.W.2d 363, 364 (Mo.App. 1991). The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded for a new trial on the record. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions