Donald Bass, Claimant/Appellant, v. Yong Min Kim, and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Decision date: UnknownED82237
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Donald Bass, Claimant/
- Respondent
- Yong Min Kim, and Division of Employment Security
Disposition
Dismissed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Donald Bass, Claimant/Appellant, v. Yong Min Kim, and Division of Employment Security, Respondents. Case Number: ED82237 Handdown Date: 03/25/2003 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: Party Acting Pro Se Counsel for Respondent: Larry R. Ruhmann Opinion Summary: The claimant, Donald Bass, appeals the labor and industrial relations commission's order disqualifying him from receiving unemployment insurance benefits. DISMISSED. Division Five holds: This Court lacks jurisdiction to review Bass' appeal because he failed to file his notice of appeal within 20 days after the commission's order became final. Citation: Opinion Author: Lawrence E. Mooney, Chief Judge Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Crahan and R. Dowd, Jr., JJ., concur. Opinion: The claimant, Donald Bass, appeals the order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming and adopting the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security. The Appeals Tribunal had determined the claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to the work or the employer. Because the claimant's notice of appeal is untimely, we dismiss the appeal.
As in all cases, this Court has a duty to examine its jurisdiction sua sponte. City of Brentwood v. Barron Holdings Intern., Ltd., L.L.C. , 66 S.W.3d 139, 142 (Mo. App. E.D. 2001). In employment security cases, an untimely filing of a notice of appeal deprives this Court of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Mathis v. Louis County Health , 84 S.W.2d 524, 525 (Mo. App. E.D. 2002). Section 288.210, RSMo 2000, governs appellate jurisdiction in employment security cases. That statute provides an aggrieved party twenty days after a decision of the Commission becomes final within which to appeal that decision by filing a notice of appeal. Id. A decision of the Commission becomes final ten days after the date it is mailed to the parties. Section 288.200.2, RSMo 2000. Here, the Commission mailed its order to the claimant on November 14, 2002. The order became final ten days later on Monday, November 25, 2002, and the claimant's notice of appeal was due on Monday, December 16, 2002. Section 288.210; Section 288.240, RSMo 2000. Thus, the claimant's notice of appeal, which was filed on December 17, 2002, was one day late. We issued an order to the claimant asking him to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. The claimant filed a response indicating he had postage problems and his notice of appeal was returned to him. Under section 288.240, a notice of appeal mailed to and received by the Commission will be considered filed as of the date endorsed on the envelope in which the notice of appeal is enclosed. Here, the claimant mailed the notice of appeal to the Commission. The Commission filed the notice of appeal on December 17, 2002, the date the envelope was endorsed by the post office. The claimant does not deny this is the date endorsed on the envelope which arrived at the Commission, but rather offers an explanation as to why he had to mail the envelope twice. Unfortunately, the procedures outlined for appeal by statute in unemployment security cases are mandatory. Burch Food Services, Inc. v. Missouri Div. of Employment Sec. , 945 S.W.2d 478, 481 (Mo. App. W.D. 1997). Although the claimant may have had a good reason for his late notice of appeal, neither section 288.200 nor section 288.210 provides a mechanism for seeking a special order to file a late notice of appeal. Mathis, 84 S.W.3d at 525; Phillips v. Clean-Tech , 34 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo. App. E.D. 2000). The appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 288.200.2cited
Section 288.200.2, RSMo
- RSMo § 288.210cited
Section 288.210, RSMo
- RSMo § 288.240cited
Section 288.240, RSMo
Cases
- court of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal mathis v louis county health 84 sw2d 524cited
Court of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal. Mathis v. Louis County Health , 84 S.W.2d 524
- inc v missouri div of employment sec 945 sw2d 478cited
Inc. v. Missouri Div. of Employment Sec. , 945 S.W.2d 478
- phillips v clean tech 34 sw3d 854cited
Phillips v. Clean-Tech , 34 S.W.3d 854
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
William Potts, Jr., Claimant/Appellant v. Council for Extended Care of Mentally Retarded Citizens, and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2003)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED82733
Brenda Williams, Claimant/Appellant, v. Lutheran Senior Services, and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2003)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED82349
Brenda Williams, Claimant/Appellant, v. ESI Mail Pharmacy Service, Inc., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2003)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED82348
Nevada J. Daniels, Claimant/Appellant v. Colonial Care Center and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2003)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED82614
Judith A. Stewart, Claimant/Appellant, v. St. Anthony's Medical Center and Division of Employment Security, Respondents(2002)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED81644
Sadiyyah Wilson, Appellant v. United Insurance Company of America and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2006)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED88864