Donna Collier, Respondent v. City of Oak Grove, Missouri, Appellant.
Decision date: UnknownWD65355
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Syllabus
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Donna Collier, Respondent v. City of Oak Grove, Missouri, Appellant. Case Number: WD65355 Handdown Date: 10/31/2006 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. Michael W. Manners Counsel for Appellant: Steve Majors Counsel for Respondent: William L. Carr Opinion Summary: Withdrawn. Citation: Opinion Author: Harold L. Lowenstein, Judge Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART. Spinden, J. concurs in separate concurring opinion. Newton, J. concurs with majority opinion. Opinion: Withdrawn. Separate Opinion:
Concurring Opinion by Judge Spinden: I concur with the majority except for its discussion of the merits of
Donna Collier's action for inverse condemnation. Having correctly concluded that Oak Grove did not preserve the issue for appeal, that should be the end of the matter. The majority's discussion of the merits of Collier's claim thus becomes dictum. I choose not to join in making a gratuitous opinion that has no precedential value. "There is no doctrine better settled than that the language of judicial decisions must be construed with reference to the facts and issues of the
particular case, and that the authority of the decision as a precedent is limited to those points of law which are raised by the record, considered by the court, and necessary to a decision." State ex rel. Baker v. Goodman, 274 S.W.2d 293, 297 (Mo. banc 1954) (quoted with approval in Parker v. Bruner, 683 S.W.2d 265 (Mo. banc 1985)). This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830
The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450