Dorothy M. Buder, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. G.A. Buder, III, Theodore Buder, Marshall Buder, Defendants/Respondents.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Dorothy M. Buder, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. G.A. Buder, III, Theodore Buder, Marshall Buder, Defendants/Respondents. Case Number: 73480 Handdown Date: 10/20/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Patrick Clifford Counsel for Appellant: Mike W. Bartolacci, Charles Baron and Lorna Frahm Counsel for Respondent: John R. Barsanti, J., Clark H. Cole, and Patrick J. Kenny Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. R. Dowd, P.J., Simon and Hoff, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Dorothy M. Buder (Appellant) appeals from the trial court's judgment dismissing with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted Count I of Appellant's Petition for Declaratory Judgment and Accounting. In this lawsuit, Appellant seeks a declaration that she may now withdraw her 1956 renunciation of a contingent interest in her grandfather's estate. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. Judgment affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for the order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.