OTT LAW

Greg Sher, Respondent/Employee, v. McCarthy Brothers, Appellant/Employer, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant/Insurer.

Decision date: UnknownED83096

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Greg Sher, Respondent/Employee, v. McCarthy Brothers, Appellant/Employer, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant/Insurer. Case Number: ED83096 Handdown Date: 04/13/2004 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: John Sander Counsel for Respondent: Gary Sanquinet Opinion Summary: McCarthy Brothers and its insurer, Liberty Insurance Company, appeal the labor and industrial relations commission's temporary or partial award affirming and adopting the administrative law judge's temporary or partial award in favor of Greg Sher. On appeal, McCarthy Brothers argues that in affirming the ALJ's award, the commission erred in (1) ordering an examination by an impartial physician to evaluate Sher and prepare a medical report and (2) finding there was sufficient competent evidence to rule in Sher's favor. DISMISSED. Division One holds: While we have jurisdiction to review an award pursuant to section 287.495, which authorizes an appeal from the final award of the commission, no appeal usually lies from a temporary or partial award. Appellate review on the issue of liability in a workers' compensation case, however, is permissible although an award is denominated "temporary or partial." In the present case, because no liability was fixed and no benefits were awarded pending a determination of compensability, we have no jurisdiction to review the issues presented. Citation: Opinion Author: Robert G. Dowd, Jr., Judge Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Gaertner, Sr., P.J. and Russell, J., concur.

Opinion: McCarthy Brothers (Employer) and Liberty Insurance Company (Insurer) appeal the Temporary or Partial Award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) which affirmed and adopted the Temporary or Partial Award of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in favor of Greg Scher (Employee). On appeal, Employer argues that in affirming the ALJ's award, the Commission erred in (1) ordering an examination by an impartial physician to evaluate the Employee and prepare a medical report and (2) finding there was sufficient competent evidence to rule in Employee's favor. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Employee testified that he developed an occupational disease injury to his left elbow and left knee when he worked as an operating engineer for Employer from August 3, 1998 to December 22, 1998, and from May 14, 1999 to May 20, 1999. Both of the conditions were surgically repaired in April and May 1999. Employer denied all liability, and therefore paid no compensation and provided no medical aid to Employee on his claim. The ALJ found that Employee had suffered a fifteen-percent degree of permanent partial disability as a result of the 1998-1999 employment. Pending an examination by an impartial physician to evaluate the Employee and prepare a medical report, the ALJ entered a Temporary or Partial Award without deciding whether Employee had sustained a compensable accident or occupational disease arising out of his employment with Employer. (FN1) The ALJ did not make a liability determination. Employer appealed to the Commission. The Commission affirmed the ALJ's award. Employer now appeals. Employee urges us to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction on the ground that the Commission's award is not final. While we have jurisdiction to review an award pursuant to Section 287.495, RSMo 2000, (FN2) which authorizes an appeal from the final award of the Commission, no appeal usually lies from a temporary or partial award. Hillenburg v. Lester E. Cox Medical Center , 879 S.W.2d 652, 655 (Mo.App.S.D.1994). An order is deemed "temporary or partial" "where it remains tentative, provisional, contingent, subject to recall, revision or consideration by the issuing agency." Id . Appellate review on the issue of liability in a workers' compensation case, however, is permissible although an award is denominated "temporary or partial." Cahall v. Cahall , 963 S.W.2d 368, 371 (Mo.App.E.D.1998). We note that the Commission's award entitled "Temporary Or Partial Award" is made pursuant to Section 287.510. (FN3) In addition, its provisions comported with those of Section 287.510 in that the award states: This award is only temporary or partial, is subject to further order and the proceedings are hereby kept open until a final award can be made. The award in the present case is not a final award but rather one which is temporary or partial pursuant to Section

287.510. Since no liability was fixed and no benefits were awarded pending a determination of compensability, we have no jurisdiction to review the issues presented. Appeal dismissed. Footnotes: FN1. Section 287.210.2, RSMo authorizes an ALJ or the Commission to order an examination by a qualified impartial physician "when deemed necessary." Given the conflicting medical opinions presented at trial, the ALJ stated in his temporary award that he was unable to determine compensability. FN2. All further statutory references are to RSMo 2000 unless otherwise indicated. FN3. Section 287.510 states: In any case a temporary or partial award of compensation may be made, and the same may be modified from time to time to meet the needs of the case, and the same may be kept open until a final award can be made, and if the same be not complied with, the amount thereof may be doubled in the final award, if the final award shall be in accordance with the temporary or partial award.

Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions

AIG Agency, Inc., d/b/a Associated Insurance Group, Appellant, vs. Missouri General Insurance Agency, Inc., Jim Baxendale and Mitch O'Brien, Respondents.(2015)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictNovember 3, 3015#ED102096

affirmed
personal-injurymajority3,747 words

Christopher Hanshaw, Appellant, vs. Crown Equipment Corp., et al., Respondents.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101091

affirmed

The court affirmed the circuit court's decision to exclude Hanshaw's expert witness testimony and grant summary judgment to Crown Equipment in a product liability case involving an allegedly defectively designed forklift. The expert's opinions were properly excluded because they were not supported by reliable methodology, as the expert performed no tests and failed to demonstrate how cited research and data supported his conclusions.

personal-injurymajority2,703 words

Mouna Apperson, f/k/a Nicholas Apperson, Appellant, vs. Natasha Kaminsky, et al., Respondents.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 23, 2026#SC101020

remanded

The court affirmed the directed verdict as to four counts against Norman based on agency but vacated and remanded the defamation counts against Kaminsky and one count against Norman, finding that the circuit court erred in requiring independent evidence of reputational damage beyond the plaintiff's own testimony when the evidence of harm was substantial and directly resulted from the defendants' statements.

personal-injuryper_curiam4,488 words

K.A.C. by and through, ASHLEY ACOSTA, NEXT FRIEND, and MICHAEL CRITES, JR., Appellants v. MISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, ET AL., Respondents(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictJanuary 12, 2026#SD38943

affirmed

Appellants sought damages for a wrongful death resulting from a motor vehicle collision involving a pursued driver, alleging the Missouri State Highway Patrol's pursuit was negligent and proximately caused the collision. The court affirmed summary judgment for MSHP, finding that Appellants failed to produce sufficient facts demonstrating that MSHP's actions were the proximate cause of the collision, which is a necessary element of their case.

personal-injuryper_curiam3,654 words

Mark and Sherry Davis, and David and Denise Kamm; Kevin Laughlin vs. City of Kearney, Missouri(2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictDecember 16, 2025#WD87389

affirmed
personal-injurymajority7,717 words