Ike Crawford, Movant-Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent, Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Ike Crawford, Movant-Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent, Respondent. Case Number: No. 70751 Handdown Date: 05/27/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. John J. Riley Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam. Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Opinion:

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and James R. Reinhard and Gary M. Gaertner, JJ. ORDER

Ike Crawford (Movant) appeals from the motion court's denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post- conviction relief. He alleges the motion court erred when it found that 1)trial counsel was not ineffective and 2)that motion counsel did not abandon him. We affirm. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum detailing our reasons for affirming the judgment of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion:

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.