OTT LAW

In the Estate of Decedent, Deceased, Howard Gillam, et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Judith Ann Gaines, Respondent/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: In the Estate of Decedent, Deceased, Howard Gillam, et al., Plaintiffs/Respondents, v. Judith Ann Gaines, Respondent/Appellant. Case Number: No. 71252 Handdown Date: 09/16/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Francois County, Hon. James H. Kelly Counsel for Appellant: Kevan L. Karraker Counsel for Respondent: David L. Mayhugh Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Karohl, JJ., concur. Opinion:

ORDER Judith Gaines appeals from the trial court's judgment imposing a constructive trust on funds held in a checking account and a certificate of deposit, titled jointly in the names of Judith Gaines and her deceased mother, Ann Gillam. The trial court found clear, cogent, and convincing evidence of Ann Gillam's intent to divide her assets equally among her children as well as Judith Gaines's agreement to do so. On appeal, Judith Gaines challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion:

None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions