OTT LAW

In the Interest of F.A.W. and P.L.W., Plaintiff, David William Kierst, Jr., Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. P.P. (Natural Mother), Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: In the Interest of F.A.W. and P.L.W., Plaintiff, David William Kierst, Jr., Juvenile Officer, Respondent, v. P.P. (Natural Mother), Appellant. Case Number: 54075 Handdown Date: 12/09/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. C. William Kramer Counsel for Appellant: Pam Anderson and Kimberly Carrington Counsel for Respondent: Patricia L. Payne and Katherine Rogers Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Spinden, P.J., Stith and Smith, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Appellant P.P. appeals the trial court's termination of her parental rights to her two children, F.A.W. and P.L.W., claiming that the trial court's ruling was against the weight of the evidence. We find that the trial court's order terminating P.P.'s parental rights was supported by substantial competent evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order and have furnished the parties with a memorandum setting forth our reasoning. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions