JAMES PONDER, APP V DIV OF EMPLOY SECURITY, RES
Decision date: August 16, 2011ED96893
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- JAMES PONDER, APP
- Respondent
- DIV OF EMPLOY SECURITY, RES
Disposition
Mixed outcome
- {"type":"affirmed","scope":null}
- {"type":"dismissed","scope":null}
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
JAMES PONDER,)No. ED96893 ) Claimant/Appellant,) ) vs.)Appeal from the Labor and )Industrial Relations Commission DIVISION OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY,) )OPINION FILED: August 16, 2011 Respondent.) James Ponder (Claimant) has filed a notice of appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's (Commission) decision regarding his claim for unemployment benefits. The appeal is dismissed. Claimant filed a claim seeking unemployment benefits. A deputy of the Division of Employment Security (Division) concluded Claimant was not entitled to unemployment benefits because he had been discharged from employment due to misconduct connected with his work. Claimant appealed to the Appeals Tribunal of the Division, which dismissed his appeal after he failed to participate in the hearing. Claimant filed an application for review with the Commission. On April 22, 2011, the Commission affirmed the Appeals Tribunal's dismissal. Claimant appealed to this Court. The Division has filed a motion to dismiss Claimant's appeal, asserting it is untimely. Claimant has not filed a response to the motion. Chapter 288, RSMo governs unemployment matters and the procedures outlined in Chapter 288 for appeal are mandatory. Burch Food Services, Inc. v. Division of Employment
2 Security, 945 S.W.2d 478, 481 (Mo. App. W.D. 1997). A notice of appeal to this Court in an unemployment matter is due within twenty days of the Commission's decision becoming final. Section 288.210, RSMo 2000. The Commission's decision becomes final ten days after it is mailed to the parties. Section 288.200.2, RSMo 2000. Here, the Commission mailed its decision to Claimant on April 22, 2011. Therefore, Claimant's notice of appeal to this Court was due on or before Monday, May 23, 2011. Sections 288.200.2, 288.210; section 288.240, RSMo 2000. Claimant mailed his notice of appeal to the Commission. The postmark on Claimant's envelope was June 4, 2011. Under section 288.240, any notice of appeal is deemed filed "as of the date endorsed by the United States post office on the envelope. . . ." Claimant's notice of appeal was deemed filed on June 4, 2011, which is untimely under section 288.210. Chapter 288 sets forth stringent guidelines for the filing of the notice of appeal and makes no provision for filing a late notice of appeal. Martinez v. Lea-Ed, Inc., 155 S.W.3d 809, 810 (Mo. App. E.D. 2005). The provisions for an order allowing a late notice of appeal as set forth in Supreme Court Rule 81.07 do not apply to special statutory proceedings, such as unemployment claims governed by Chapter 288. See, Holmes v. Navajo Freight Lines, Inc., 488 S.W.2d 311, 314-15 (Mo. App. 1972). Because Claimant's notice of appeal was untimely under Chapter 288, our only recourse is to dismiss Claimant's appeal. The Division's motion to dismiss is granted. The appeal is dismissed. __________________________________ KURT S. ODENWALD, CHIEF JUDGE ROBERT G. DOWD, JR., and GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., J., Concur.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 288.200.2cited
Section 288.200.2, RSMo
- RSMo § 288.210cited
Section 288.210, RSMo
- RSMo § 288.240cited
section 288.240, RSMo
Rules
- Rule 81.07cited
Rule 81.07
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
Tom Wickis, Appellant, v. FBCMO, LLC d/b/a Fitz's Beverage and Bottle, and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2011)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictOctober 25, 2011#ED97139
MARY HEFFNER, APP V DIV OF EMPLOY SECURITY, RES(2011)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictAugust 16, 2011#ED96690
GLENDA BONNER, APP V MERS/MO GOODWILL IND., RES(2011)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictAugust 16, 2011#ED96898
Tabitha Watkins, Appellant, v. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2011)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictJune 14, 2011#ED96653
Michael Manuel, Appellant, v. World Wide Technology Holding Co., Inc., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2011)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMay 3, 2011#ED96358
Robert Clerkin, Appellant, v. Estes Express Lines Corporation, and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2011)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 22, 2011#ED96012