OTT LAW

John Buff, Appellant, v. Donald Roper, Respondent.

Decision date: UnknownED85318

Parties & Roles

Appellant
John Buff
Respondent
Donald Roper

Disposition

Dismissed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: John Buff, Appellant, v. Donald Roper, Respondent. Case Number: ED85318 Handdown Date: 01/25/2005 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Washington County, Hon. Troy Hyde Counsel for Appellant: Party Acting Pro Se Counsel for Respondent: Andrew W. Hassell Opinion Summary: John Buff appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. DISMISSED. Division Five holds: No appeal lies from a judgment dismissing a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Citation: Opinion Author: George W. Draper III, C.J. Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Crahan and Norton, JJ., concur. Opinion: John Buff (Appellant) appeals from a judgment denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Appeal dismissed. Initially, this Court must determine whether it has jurisdiction. If we lack jurisdiction to entertain an appeal, then it should be dismissed. Fischer v. City of Washington , 55 S.W.3d 372, 377 (Mo. App. E.D. 2001). Here, Appellant seeks to appeal from the circuit court's judgment denying his petition for writ of habeas corpus. An appeal does not lie from the denial of a petition for habeas corpus. Blackmon v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole , 97 S.W.3d 458 (Mo. banc 2003); McDermott v. State , 120 S.W.3d 261, 262 (Mo. App. E.D. 2003). We issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. In response,

Appellant filed his Appellant's Brief that argues the merits of his appeal. Appellant offers no argument about the judgment's appealability. To the extent that Appellant may be arguing that he is entitled to review because he is making a claim of actual innocence, he offers no legal support for this assertion. Indeed, a petitioner's remedy where a petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied is to file a new writ petition in a higher court. Webster v. Purkett , 110 S.W.3d 832, 837 (Mo. App. E.D. 2003). Appellant has not filed a new writ petition. The appeal is dismissed for lack of an appealable judgment. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Cases

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.