Mary M. King, Respondent, v. Howard Danzig, Appellant.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Mary M. King, Respondent, v. Howard Danzig, Appellant. Case Number: 74045 Handdown Date: 10/06/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Robert H. Dierker, Jr. Counsel for Appellant: Party Acting Pro Se Counsel for Respondent: Douglas Kevin Rush Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Simon, P.J., Knaup Crane and Mooney, JJ., concur. Opinion: ORDER Howard Danzig appeals the trial court's judgment granting Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce and Compel Settlement Against Defendant Howard Danzig. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.