Nick Fortner, et al., Appellant, v. Fleetwood Homes of Tennessee, Inc., et al., Respondent.
Decision date: UnknownWD65126
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Nick Fortner, et al., Appellant, v. Fleetwood Homes of Tennessee, Inc., et al., Respondent. Case Number: WD65126 Handdown Date: 11/01/2005 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Lafayette County, Hon. Dennis A. Rolf Counsel for Appellant: John B. Neher Counsel for Respondent: Steven Martin Aaron Opinion Summary:
Nick Fortner appeals a summary judgment in favor of Fleetwood Homes of Tennessee, Inc. Fortner contends that there are controverted material facts that prevent summary judgment. DISMISSED. Division holds: In a separate proceeding, this court granted a writ of prohibition finding that the case had been dismissed properly while the summary judgment motion was pending and, therefore, the trial court had no jurisdiction to rule on the summary judgment motion. State ex rel. Fortner v. Rolf, WD64974 (September 30, 2005). Because this appeal is on the merits of that motion, it is now moot. Citation: Opinion Author: Ronald R. Holliger, Presiding Judge Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Ulrich and Ellis, JJ., concur. Opinion:
Nick Fortner (Fortner) appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Fleetwood Homes of Tennessee, Inc. (Fleetwood). Fortner contends that there are controverted material facts that prevent summary judgment. We dismiss the appeal because it is moot. In a separate proceeding this court has granted a writ of prohibition finding that the case had
been properly dismissed while the summary judgment motion was pending and, therefore, the trial court had no jurisdiction to rule upon the summary judgment motion. State ex rel. Fortner v. Rolf , WD 64974 (September 30, 2005). Because this appeal is on the merits of that motion, it is now moot. Appeal dismissed. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830
The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450