Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)
Decision date: UnknownED105468
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
OCTOBER 16, 2018
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).
- ED105468 JAMES BROWN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED105719 STATE OF MO, RES V JONATHAN RICE, APP
- ED105810 CASITDEL WOOTEN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED105816 DONALD R. NAPPIER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED105917 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOHN MAHAN, APP
- ED106008 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V WILLIE IVY, APP
- ED106030 JAVON D. MARSH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED106031 FREDDIE R. POTTS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED106126 CHARLES A. WOOLFORK, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI,
RES
- ED106147 EMANUAL L. NAILOR, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
OCTOBER 16, 2018
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).
- ED106175 SHAHEAN JONES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED106177 ROBERT RHODES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED106230 RONNY AVERY, RES V GEORGE WHITE, JR., APP
- ED106270 PATRICK MCCARTHY, APP V TIMOTHY WILSON, RES
- ED106294 KENNETH VAUGHN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED106472 PRESTON HARLOW, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED106589 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V NICHOLAS COMPARATO,
APP
Related Opinions
John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830
The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450