St. Louis Counsel
OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED91432

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

View Original on courts.mo.gov

Opinion

OCTOBER 20, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED91432 EDWARD D. MERACLE, RES V NICOLE D. MERACLE,

APP

  1. ED91784 MICHAEL LIVINGSTON, RES V RICK GREGG CONST CO,

APP

  1. ED91837 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JOSHUA J TURNER, APP
  1. ED91874 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANTHONY S. LEONARD, APP
  1. ED91923 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ROBERT ATKINSON, APP
  1. ED92004 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V JAMES SANDERS, APP
  1. ED92063 IN THE MATTER OF KENNETH GARRIS
  1. ED92094 CURTIS ROBINSON, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92181 STATE OF MO, RES V JHAVAUNN D MCCOTTRELL, APP
  1. ED92185 JAMES MORGAN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

OCTOBER 20, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92216 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MARK A. MOORE, APP
  1. ED92232 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LASHAWN JORDAN, APP
  1. ED92248 JASON GRIFFIN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92280 JOHN DOE KS, APP V MAR JAMES (AKA JAMES

BEINE),RES

  1. ED92397 IN THE INTEREST OF: S.M.I.
  1. ED92478 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SHEILA V. WINSTON, APP
  1. ED92478 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V SHEILA V. WINSTON, APP
  1. ED92482 JOHN MARKLE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92606 THOMAS M. JONES, JR., APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92623 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ANDRE WILSON, APP

OCTOBER 20, 2009

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED92639 LONNELL WALKER, APP V MO DEPT OF INSURANCE,

RES

  1. ED92659 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V CORNELIUS D. RODGERS,

APP

  1. ED92756 JOHNNY WYATT, APP V BLAIR PACKAGING, ET AL, RES
  1. ED92845 NEAL JOHNSON, APP V SECOND INJURY FUND, RES
  1. ED92879 MICHAEL EDWARDS, RES V MIDWEST BLOCK & BRICK,

APP

CORRECTIONS

  1. ED91821 LAWRENCE MUELLER, AAP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED92778 GEORGE W MORGAN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES

Related Opinions

AIG Agency, Inc., d/b/a Associated Insurance Group, Appellant, vs. Missouri General Insurance Agency, Inc., Jim Baxendale and Mitch O'Brien, Respondents.(2015)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictNovember 3, 3015#ED102096

affirmed
personal-injurymajority3,747 words

Christopher Hanshaw, Appellant, vs. Crown Equipment Corp., et al., Respondents.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101091

affirmed

The court affirmed the circuit court's decision to exclude Hanshaw's expert witness testimony and grant summary judgment to Crown Equipment in a product liability case involving an allegedly defectively designed forklift. The expert's opinions were properly excluded because they were not supported by reliable methodology, as the expert performed no tests and failed to demonstrate how cited research and data supported his conclusions.

personal-injurymajority2,703 words

Mouna Apperson, f/k/a Nicholas Apperson, Appellant, vs. Natasha Kaminsky, et al., Respondents.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 23, 2026#SC101020

remanded

The court affirmed the directed verdict as to four counts against Norman based on agency but vacated and remanded the defamation counts against Kaminsky and one count against Norman, finding that the circuit court erred in requiring independent evidence of reputational damage beyond the plaintiff's own testimony when the evidence of harm was substantial and directly resulted from the defendants' statements.

personal-injuryper_curiam4,488 words

K.A.C. by and through, ASHLEY ACOSTA, NEXT FRIEND, and MICHAEL CRITES, JR., Appellants v. MISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, ET AL., Respondents(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictJanuary 12, 2026#SD38943

affirmed

Appellants sought damages for a wrongful death resulting from a motor vehicle collision involving a pursued driver, alleging the Missouri State Highway Patrol's pursuit was negligent and proximately caused the collision. The court affirmed summary judgment for MSHP, finding that Appellants failed to produce sufficient facts demonstrating that MSHP's actions were the proximate cause of the collision, which is a necessary element of their case.

personal-injuryper_curiam3,654 words

Mark and Sherry Davis, and David and Denise Kamm; Kevin Laughlin vs. City of Kearney, Missouri(2025)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictDecember 16, 2025#WD87389

affirmed
personal-injurymajority7,717 words