OTT LAW

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED94154

Opinion

APRIL 19, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED94154 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ROBERT A. GIANCOLA,

APP

  1. ED94704 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RANDY BOLDEN, APP
  1. ED94844 JESSE GOODUES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94854 ANDRE C. WILLIAMS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94927 MICHAEL SHARKS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED94974 TIMOTHY SIGMAN, RES V STEPHANIE SIGMAN RODDEN,

APP

  1. ED95073 DERRICK BROWN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED95092 CITY OF BRIDGETON, RES V KENNETH YARBROUGH, APP
  1. ED95157 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MARK FRISELLA, APP
  1. ED95296 RICK MIKALE, ET AL, RES V JOHN BOMMARITO OLDS, APP

APRIL 19, 2011

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95327 BRITTANY DANDRIDGE, APP V HD DIRECT, LLC, RES
  1. ED95593 LARRY WHITE, PLT V CITY OF LADUE, MO, RES
  1. ED95610 EDIN SAKIC, APP V CENTAUR BUILDING SERVICES, RES
  1. ED95705 LINDA DEBRECHT,APP V CARDINAL RITTER

INSTITUTE,RES

  1. ED95818 HARRY HORTON, APP V VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERV,

RES

Related Opinions