Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)
Decision date: UnknownED94154
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
APRIL 19, 2011
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).
- ED94154 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ROBERT A. GIANCOLA,
APP
- ED94704 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V RANDY BOLDEN, APP
- ED94844 JESSE GOODUES, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED94854 ANDRE C. WILLIAMS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED94927 MICHAEL SHARKS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED94974 TIMOTHY SIGMAN, RES V STEPHANIE SIGMAN RODDEN,
APP
- ED95073 DERRICK BROWN, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
- ED95092 CITY OF BRIDGETON, RES V KENNETH YARBROUGH, APP
- ED95157 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V MARK FRISELLA, APP
- ED95296 RICK MIKALE, ET AL, RES V JOHN BOMMARITO OLDS, APP
APRIL 19, 2011
THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).
- ED95327 BRITTANY DANDRIDGE, APP V HD DIRECT, LLC, RES
- ED95593 LARRY WHITE, PLT V CITY OF LADUE, MO, RES
- ED95610 EDIN SAKIC, APP V CENTAUR BUILDING SERVICES, RES
- ED95705 LINDA DEBRECHT,APP V CARDINAL RITTER
INSTITUTE,RES
- ED95818 HARRY HORTON, APP V VEOLIA ENVIRONMENTAL SERV,
RES
Related Opinions
John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830
The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450