Skip to content
St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Orders Pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and/or 84.16(b)

Decision date: UnknownED95997

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar insurance bad faith issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Insurance Bad FaithPersonal InjuryCriminal Law
Discuss a Similar Insurance Bad Faith Matter(314) 710-2740
View Original on courts.mo.gov

Opinion

MARCH 20, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED95997 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V BRADLEY SNEED, APP
  1. ED96140 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V BLAKE SHELTON, APP
  1. ED96150 RODRICK A RENDER, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96343 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V FREDDIE MARTIN, APP
  1. ED96379 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DAVID WHITT, APP
  1. ED96403 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V YANCY L WHITE, APP
  1. ED96446 IN THE INTEREST OF: T.G.O.
  1. ED96477 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V OMORUYI N. OGASOGIE, APP
  1. ED96488 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V ROBERT T CHILDS, APP
  1. ED96489 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V DEANGELO D TATE, APP

MARCH 20, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED96543 OGERTA HARTWEIN, APP V KIRK HARTWEIN, RES
  1. ED96576 CARL E. LUSS, JR, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96577 RONALD BURNS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96625 CHARZETTA STEELE, APP V SHELTER MUTUAL INS CO,

RES

  1. ED96645 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V BILLY J FORD, APP
  1. ED96664 JENNIFER SANSOUCIE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96700 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V TARA L LATHAM, APP
  1. ED96701 TIMOTHY GARNETT, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96781 ANTONIO WHITE, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96807 STATE OF MISSOURI, RES V LEROY MYLES, APP

MARCH 20, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED96855 IN THE INTEREST OF: A.D.R. AND C.L.R.
  1. ED96861 PATRICK TOBIAS, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96883 AVERY MCCOY, APPELLANT V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED96980 REX ROME, APP V AMERICAN STAFFING, LLC, RES
  1. ED96982 DENNIS CURTIS, APP V STATE OF MO, RES
  1. ED96993 DEBORAH LANGENECKERT, APP V DAVID WEBER, RES
  1. ED97010 ROSIEMARY WILLIAMS, APP V KELLY SERVICES, INC., RE
  1. ED97019 DERRICK SMITH, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97021 ERNESTO DELATEJERA, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97075 IN THE MATTER OF JACQUELINE A. BRADLEY, DECEASED

MARCH 20, 2012

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 84.16(b) OR RULE 30.25(b).

  1. ED97134 ROBERT BAYER, APP V SUNTRUP BUICK, RES
  1. ED97136 SHEILA MCCOLLOM, PLT V. JOSEPH MCCOLLOM, APP
  1. ED97210 MELICIA LYTLE, APP V CITY OF ST LOUIS, RES
  1. ED97247 MITCHEL FREEMAN, APP V SECOND INJURY FUND, RES
  1. ED97248 GEORGE MOORE, APP V SECOND INJURY FUND, RES
  1. ED97272 ORLANDO WOOLFOLK, APP V STATE OF MISSOURI, RES
  1. ED97322 CARLENA ROEBUCK, APP V PROGRESSIVE NW INS CO.,

RES

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Rules

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

Christopher Hanshaw, Appellant, vs. Crown Equipment Corp., et al., Respondents.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101091

affirmed

The court affirmed the circuit court's decision to exclude Hanshaw's expert witness testimony and grant summary judgment to Crown Equipment in a product liability case involving an allegedly defectively designed forklift. The expert's opinions were properly excluded because they were not supported by reliable methodology, as the expert performed no tests and failed to demonstrate how cited research and data supported his conclusions.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Call About This ClaimAsk About This Claim
Read The Personal Injury GuideGuide
Civil Litigationmajority2,703 words
Read opinion

Mouna Apperson, f/k/a Nicholas Apperson, Appellant, vs. Natasha Kaminsky, et al., Respondents.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriJanuary 23, 2026#SC101020

remanded

The court affirmed the directed verdict as to four counts against Norman based on agency but vacated and remanded the defamation counts against Kaminsky and one count against Norman, finding that the circuit court erred in requiring independent evidence of reputational damage beyond the plaintiff's own testimony when the evidence of harm was substantial and directly resulted from the defendants' statements.

per_curiam4,488 words
Read opinion

K.A.C. by and through, ASHLEY ACOSTA, NEXT FRIEND, and MICHAEL CRITES, JR., Appellants v. MISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY PATROL, ET AL., Respondents(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictJanuary 12, 2026#SD38943

affirmed

Appellants sought damages for a wrongful death resulting from a motor vehicle collision involving a pursued driver, alleging the Missouri State Highway Patrol's pursuit was negligent and proximately caused the collision. The court affirmed summary judgment for MSHP, finding that Appellants failed to produce sufficient facts demonstrating that MSHP's actions were the proximate cause of the collision, which is a necessary element of their case.

Injured in a similar issue?

Call now or send the claim details with this opinion context preserved.

Call About This ClaimAsk About This Claim
Read The Car Accidents GuideGuide
Personal InjuryWrongful Deathper_curiam3,654 words
Read opinion