Patricia Ward, Individually and in her capacity as Plaintiff ad Litem for Nona Woods and Darrell Woods, Individually and in his capacity as Plaintiff ad Litem for Nona Woods v. National Healthcare Corporation, et al., Charleston Manor Nursing, LLC, et al.
Decision date: January 13, 2009SC89392
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
) Patricia Ward, Individually ) and In Her Capacity as ) Plaintiff Ad Litem For Nona Woods and ) Darrell Woods, Individually ) and In His Capacity as ) Plaintiff Ad Litem for Nona Woods 1 , ) ) Respondents, ) ) v. ) No. SC89392 ) National Healthcare Corporation, et al., ) Charleston Manor Nursing, LLC, et al., ) ) Appellants. )
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DUNKLIN COUNTY The Honorable Stephen R. Sharp, Judge Plaintiff Patricia Ward's mother, Nona Woods, was placed in NHC Healthcare, a nursing care facility, in May 2003. At the time of Woods'
1 Patricia Ward and Darrell Woods are children of the decedent, Nona Woods. Each is listed in the caption as "Plaintiff Ad Litem." Children of the decedent are entitled to bring a wrongful death action as plaintiffs under section 537.080.1(1). RSMo 2000. A "plaintiff ad litem" is a person appointed by a court to maintain the wrongful death suit under section 537.080.1(3) if there are no relatives of the decedent in the classes of persons described in section 537.080(1) or (2). Under the statute, Ms. Ward and Mr. Woods are plaintiffs; they are not plaintiffs ad litem. Section 537.095 provides that not all persons described in the statute as plaintiffs need to join in the action. The person prosecuting the wrongful death action does so on behalf of all those who may be entitled to recover.
admission, another of her daughters, Bobby Rouse, signed an "Admission and Financial Contract," which contained an arbitration provision. Woods' signature also appears on the agreement. Woods died in October 2003. Ward filed a wrongful death suit against the nursing care facility in 2005. The NHC defendants subsequently filed a motion to enforce the arbitration clause, which the trial court overruled. The NHC defendants appealed. After the Court of Appeals, Southern District, dismissed the appeal, the case was transferred to this Court pursuant to Rule 83.04 For the reasons discussed in Dale Lawrence v. Beverly Manor, ____ S.W.3d ____ (Mo. banc 2008) (No. SC89291, decided January 13, 2009), the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. The only relevant factual distinction between this case and Lawrence is that, in this case, Bobby Rouse as well as the decedent, Nona Woods, signed the arbitration agreement. The signature line under Rouse's name indicates that Rouse signed as Woods' "Legal Representative." Rouse is not an attorney, nor was she her mother's guardian, nor had she been given durable power of attorney or any other legally binding status as her mother's agent. The phrase "legal representative," in the absence of something indicating some status conferred by law or by a court, has no legal meaning. The phrase "legal representative" may have some factual significance in this situation, however. The words "legal representative" under Rouse's signature make clear that Rouse was not signing in her individual capacity or on her own
2
behalf as a potential member of a class of wrongful death plaintiffs. Rouse's signature on the agreement carries no legally binding weight regarding the arbitration of a wrongful death claim. The arbitration agreement is not binding on Rouse or any of the other members of the class of wrongful death plaintiffs. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
________________________________ Michael A. Wolff, Judge
All concur.
3
Related Opinions
Rodney Lee Lincoln, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2014)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 2, 2104#ED100987
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080
McGregory appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the third degree and property damage in the second degree, raising unpreserved claims of error regarding evidence admissibility and the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund judgment amount. The court affirmed the convictions but modified the CVC judgment amount, finding the trial court entered a judgment in excess of that authorized by law.
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. RUSSELL KENNETH CLANCY, Appellant(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictFebruary 25, 2026#SD38782
The court affirmed Clancy's conviction for second-degree assault against a special victim after a jury trial. The evidence was sufficient to prove that Clancy punched an elderly civilian in the face and struck a police officer during an altercation at a laundromat, supporting the conviction under Missouri statute § 565.052.3.
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. James Willis Peters, Appellant.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101218
James Willis Peters appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, challenging whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all four of his prior offenses were intoxication-related traffic offenses. The court found the state failed to sufficiently prove his 2002 offense was an IRTO and therefore vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Gerald R. Nytes, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED113261
Gerald Nytes appealed his conviction for violating a full order of protection, arguing the State failed to prove he had notice of the order as required by statute. The court affirmed, finding sufficient evidence of notice based on Nytes's presence at the contested order of protection hearing and his subsequent violation through phone calls made from jail to the protected party.