River City Restoration, Inc., Respondent, v. Richard V. Nelson and Joanna R. Nelson, Appellants.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: River City Restoration, Inc., Respondent, v. Richard V. Nelson and Joanna R. Nelson, Appellants. Case Number: 72230 Handdown Date: 05/26/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Evelyn M. Baker Counsel for Appellant: Eugene Portman, Francis E. Pennington and James R. Dankenbring Counsel for Respondent: Gregory F. Hoffmann Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. R. Dowd, Jr., P.J., Simon and Hoff, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Richard V. and Joanna R. Nelson (Nelsons) appeal from judgment in favor of River City Restoration, Inc. (River City). Nelsons argue the court erred in entering judgment: (1) on an improper measure of damages; and (2) denying return of the amount overpaid to River City. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.