Robert D. Bush, Respondent v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Appellant.
Decision date: UnknownED83532
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Robert D. Bush, Respondent v. Director of Revenue, State of Missouri, Appellant. Case Number: ED83532 Handdown Date: 07/27/2004 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau, Hon. Gary A. Kamp Counsel for Appellant: Charles S. Birmingham Counsel for Respondent: Michael H. Maguire Opinion Summary: The Missouri director of revenue appeals the judgment granting Robert Dale Bush's petition for limited driving privileges. Bush filed a motion to dismiss this appeal as moot. We grant Bush's motion to dismiss. DISMISSED. Southern Division holds: Bush's full driving privileges were restored prior to the appeal. The issue, therefore, is moot. Citation: Opinion Author: Lawrence G. Crahan, Judge Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Sullivan, C.J., and Ahrens, J., Concur. Opinion: Missouri Director of Revenue appeals the judgment granting Robert Dale Bush's ("Movant") petition for limited driving privileges. Movant filed a motion to dismiss this appeal as moot. We grant Movant's motion to dismiss. Movant was convicted of driving while intoxicated in violation of section 577.010 RSMo. (FN1) His driving privileges
were revoked pursuant to section 577.505. He petitioned for and was granted limited driving privileges for the period of August 14, 2003 through February 10, 2004. Director filed simultaneous appeals on this case and that of another driver (FN2) to resolve an issue with the interpretation of section 302.309.3(5)(d). Movant filed a Motion to Dismiss this appeal on the ground that his full driving privileges were restored February 10, 2004, making the issue of the appeal moot. Any opinion on a hypothetical is advisory and we are barred from issuing advisory opinions. Block v. Gallagher, 71 S.W.3d 682, 685 (Mo.App. 2002). Although Director invites us to examine the statutory issue presented as an issue of public interest and importance, we decline to do so for the reasons stated in Smith v. Director of Revenue, ED 83533 (Mo. App. E.D. July 13, 2004). Driver's motion to dismiss is hereby granted.
Footnotes: FN1. All statutory references are to RSMo 2000 unless otherwise noted. FN2. Smith v. Department of Revenue, ED83533 (Mo. App. E.D. July 13, 2004). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830
The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450