Robert J. Barker and Jane Barker, Plainitiffs/Respondents, v. Union Electric Company, Defendant/Appellant.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Robert J. Barker and Jane Barker, Plainitiffs/Respondents, v. Union Electric Company, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 73112 Handdown Date: 09/15/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Margaret Neill Counsel for Appellant: Idaline L. Hall Counsel for Respondent: Mark Ludwig and Douglas Hennon Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Pudlowski, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Ahrens, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER In this negligence action, Union Electric Company (UE) appeals from the denial of its motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or for a New Trial brought after a jury verdict and judgment for respondents, Robert J. Barker and Jane Barker (Barkers). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).(FN1)

Footnote: FN1.Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Appeal and for Damages for Frivolous Appeal is denied.

Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.