OTT LAW

Roland T. Tyler, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: Roland T. Tyler, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: No. 53760 Handdown Date: 08/19/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Buchanan County, Hon. Patrick K. Robb Counsel for Appellant: A. Renae Adamson Counsel for Respondent: Philip M. Koppe Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Smart, P.J., Lowenstein and Stith, JJ., concur. Opinion: Mr. Tyler appeals from the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035 without an evidentiary hearing following his guilty plea to possession of a controlled substance in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo 1994. His sole basis for the motion was the allegation that counsel was ineffective in failing to investigate facts regarding who owned the coat in which the drugs were found and who owned the home at which he was arrested. We have reviewed the briefs and the record on appeal and agree with the motion court that the facts alleged, even if true, would not have warranted relief. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm denial of his motion without an evidentiary hearing by this summary order, but have provided the parties with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion:

None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions