Sadiyyah Wilson, Appellant v. United Insurance Company of America and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.
Decision date: UnknownED88864
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Sadiyyah Wilson, Appellant v. United Insurance Company of America and Division of Employment Security, Respondents. Case Number: ED88864 Handdown Date: 12/26/2006 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: Sadiyyah Wilson, Pro Se Counsel for Respondent: Cynthia Ann Quetsch Opinion Summary: Sadiyyah Wilson appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the Appeals Tribunal's decision denying her claim for unemployment compensation. APPEAL DISMISSED. Division Five holds: This Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal where the notice of appeal to this Court was untimely and there is no mechanism for a late notice of appeal. Citation: Opinion Author: Booker T. Shaw, Chief Judge Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Norton, J., and Cohen, J., concur. Opinion: Sadiyyah Wilson (Claimant) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirming the Appeals Tribunal's decision denying her claim for unemployment compensation. The Division of Employment Security
(Division) has filed a motion to dismiss Claimant's appeal because her notice of appeal to this Court is untimely. Claimant has not filed a response to the motion. In unemployment cases, the notice of appeal from the Commission's decision is due within twenty days of the Commission's decision becoming final. Section 288.210, RSMo 2000. The Commission's decision becomes final ten days after it is mailed to the parties. Section 288.200.2, RSMo 2000. Here, the Commission mailed its decision to Claimant on September 27, 2006. Therefore, her notice of appeal was due on October 27, 2006. Sections 288.200.2, 288.210. The Commission received Claimant's notice of appeal in an envelope postmarked October 30, 2006, and it is deemed filed on that date. Section 288.240, RSMo 2000. Claimant's notice of appeal is untimely. The unemployment statutes make no provision for late filing of a notice of appeal. Phillips v. Clean-Tech, 34 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo. App. E.D. 2000). As a result, an untimely notice of appeal deprives this Court of jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and our only recourse is to dismiss it. Watkins v. De Van Sealants, Inc., 194 S.W.3d 873, 874 (Mo. App. E.D. 2006). The Division's motion to dismiss is granted. Claimant's appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
A.L.O., Respondent, vs. G.L.N., Appellant.(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 10, 2024#ED112141
Linda G. Runnels, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 23, 2024#ED111645