OTT LAW

Salome Anne Engle, Appellant, v. Comprehealth, Inc., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Salome Anne Engle, Appellant, v. Comprehealth, Inc., and Division of Employment Security, Respondents. Case Number: 73636 Handdown Date: 10/20/1998 Appeal From: Labor and Industrial Relations Commission Counsel for Appellant: David M. Heimos Counsel for Respondent: James Foster, Larry R. Ruhmann and Cynthia Quetsch Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. R. Dowd, C.J., Karohl, J., and Crist, Sr.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Salome Anne Engle (Engle) appeals from the order entered by the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal of the Division of Employment Security (Appeals Tribunal) denying her claim for unemployment benefits. Engle contends the Commission erred in affirming the decision of the Appeals Tribunal because she did not voluntarily leave her employment, rather she was terminated by CompreHealth, Inc. (CompreHealth) upon taking work as an independent contractor. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion:

None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions