Sandra Rogger, Respondent, v. Robert L. Rogger, Appellant, v. Tosha Rogger, Respondent.
Decision date: Unknown
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: Sandra Rogger, Respondent, v. Robert L. Rogger, Appellant, v. Tosha Rogger, Respondent. Case Number: 72831 Handdown Date: 05/26/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County Counsel for Appellant: Richard Scott Bender Counsel for Respondent: Henry T. Vogt Opinion Summary: Robert L. Rogger appeals from the order entered by a family court commissioner in the St. Louis County circuit court denying his motion to find Tosha Rogger in contempt of a prior court order. DISMISSED. Division One holds: The appeal must be dismissed because the judgment, though denominated a "judgment," is not signed by a judge as mandated by our state's constitution and, therefore, is not final and appealable. Citation: Opinion Author: Gary M. Gaertner, Judge Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Grimm, P.J., and Pudlowski, J., concur. Opinion: Appellant, Robert L. Rogger, appeals from the order entered by a family court commissioner in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying appellant's motion to find respondent, Tosha Rogger, in contempt of a prior court order.(FN1) We dismiss. Recently, our Supreme Court ruled documents which purport to be appealable judgments must be signed
by a judge as mandated by our state constitution. Slay v. Slay, Slip Op. Nos. 80405, 80406, and 80407 at 2 (Mo.banc March 24, 1998). Here, the document, though denominated a "judgment," is signed only by the commissioner who heard the case. Accordingly, there is no final judgment from which the parties may appeal. The appeal is dismissed. Footnotes: FN1. Sandra Rogger is not a party to this appeal. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
John Doe, Jane Doe, Jan Doe, Janet Doe, and Judy Doe, Individually and On Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated vs. Meritas Health Corporation and Board of Trustees of North Kansas City Hospital(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictMarch 3, 2026#WD87830
The court reversed the circuit court's grant of sovereign immunity dismissal, finding that plaintiffs' common-law claims against the hospital board could proceed. However, the court affirmed dismissal of statutory claims for computer tampering and identity theft, and remanded the case for further proceedings on the remaining claims.
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450