State ex rel. Kelly Lock, Relator v. The Honorable Wiliam C. Seay, Judge, Circuit Court, Wayne County, Respondent.
Decision date: Unknown
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion
Case Style: State ex rel. Kelly Lock, Relator v. The Honorable Wiliam C. Seay, Judge, Circuit Court, Wayne County, Respondent. Case Number: 80125 Handdown Date: 12/23/1997 Appeal From: Original Proceeding In Prohibition Counsel for Appellant: Stacy L. Anderson and Laura M. Vogel Counsel for Respondent: James E. Bowles Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: All concur Opinion: William E. Caudel pleaded guilty to a felony and is an inmate confined in an institution of the department of corrections. The institution is not located in Wayne County, Missouri. Nevertheless, Mr. Caudel filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Circuit Court of Wayne County. Mr. Lock, the superintendent of the institution in which Mr. Caudel was incarcerated, sought to dismiss the action on the basis that the Wayne County court lacked jurisdiction over the habeas corpus proceeding. The respondent denied the motion to dismiss. Mr. Lock filed a petition for writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, prohibition in this Court, challenging the jurisdiction of the respondent. This Court issued its preliminary order in prohibition, which, as modified, is now made absolute. Section 532.030, RSMo 1994, provides that a person held in custody on a charge of crime or misdemeanor in the first instance shall file the petition for writ of habeas corpus in the county in which the petitioner is held. "The argument that the judge of the sentencing court is much more capable of hearing and disposing of the [petitioner's] claim than a
judge in a different area may be a reasonable one, but the governing rules place the venue of habeas actions elsewhere." White v. State, 779 S.W.2d 571, 572 (Mo. banc 1989). Venue does not exist in Wayne County. Under section 476.410, RSMo 1994, the respondent was required to transfer the case to any circuit in which the action could have been brought. The preliminary order is made absolute except that the respondent shall transfer the case as required by section 476.410. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
Rodney Lee Lincoln, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2014)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 2, 2104#ED100987
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080
McGregory appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the third degree and property damage in the second degree, raising unpreserved claims of error regarding evidence admissibility and the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund judgment amount. The court affirmed the convictions but modified the CVC judgment amount, finding the trial court entered a judgment in excess of that authorized by law.
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. RUSSELL KENNETH CLANCY, Appellant(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictFebruary 25, 2026#SD38782
The court affirmed Clancy's conviction for second-degree assault against a special victim after a jury trial. The evidence was sufficient to prove that Clancy punched an elderly civilian in the face and struck a police officer during an altercation at a laundromat, supporting the conviction under Missouri statute § 565.052.3.
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. James Willis Peters, Appellant.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101218
James Willis Peters appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, challenging whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all four of his prior offenses were intoxication-related traffic offenses. The court found the state failed to sufficiently prove his 2002 offense was an IRTO and therefore vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Gerald R. Nytes, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED113261
Gerald Nytes appealed his conviction for violating a full order of protection, arguing the State failed to prove he had notice of the order as required by statute. The court affirmed, finding sufficient evidence of notice based on Nytes's presence at the contested order of protection hearing and his subsequent violation through phone calls made from jail to the protected party.