State of Missouri, ex rel. Manuel Drumm, W.H. Winchester, III and Stephanie M. Gleason, Individually and d/b/a Drumm, Winchester & Gleason, Relators, v. The Honorable William C. Seay, Judge Of The Circuit Court, 42nd Judicial Circuit, Acting by Appointment in Mississippi County, Respondent.
Decision date: May 14, 1996
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Case Style: State of Missouri, ex rel. Manuel Drumm, W.H. Winchester, III and Stephanie M. Gleason, Individually and d/b/a Drumm, Winchester & Gleason, Relators, v. The Honorable William C. Seay, Judge Of The Circuit Court, 42nd Judicial Circuit, Acting by Appointment in Mississippi County, Respondent. Case Number: 22590 Handdown Date: 03/25/1999 Appeal From: PROCEEDING IN MANDAMUS Counsel for Appellant: George W. Gilmore, Jr., and William Clayton Vandivort Counsel for Respondent: Mitchell A. Margo Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Phillip R. Garrison, Chief Judge Opinion Vote: PRELIMINARY ORDER OF MANDAMUS MADE ABSOLUTE. Shrum, P.J., and Montgomery, J., concur. Opinion:
Nancy Stillman, trustee of Mid-West Management Trust ("Plaintiff"), filed an action for legal malpractice against Manuel Drumm, W.H. Winchester, III and Stephanie M. Gleason, individually and d/b/a Drumm, Winchester & Gleason ("Relators"), in the Circuit Court of Scott County. On August 17, 1995, Plaintiff filed a motion for change of venue that was granted on May 14, 1996, and the case was transferred to Mississippi County. Plaintiff filed a second motion for change of venue on May 1, 1998. On August 25, 1998, Judge Seay ("Respondent") overruled the second motion, but took up the first motion which was granted more than two years earlier, set aside the order granting a change of venue to Mississippi County, and transferred the case to Butler County. Relators filed a petition for writ of mandamus directing Respondent to vacate his order of August 25, 1998, "thus leaving the case venued in Mississippi County, Missouri, and not Butler County, Missouri." This Court entered a preliminary order in mandamus directing Respondent to take no further action to enforce
the order of August 25, 1998, until further order by this Court. We now make that preliminary order absolute. A writ of mandamus will issue where the court has exceeded its jurisdiction or authority. State ex rel. Schnuck Markets, Inc. v. Koehr, 859 S.W.2d 696, 698 (Mo. banc 1993). The writ may lie both to compel a court to do that which it is obligated by law to do and to undo that which the court was by law prohibited from doing. Id. Relators contend in their point relied on: The trial court erred in setting aside the order of Judge Heckemeyer entered May 14, 1996, and transferring the case from Mississippi County because once Judge Heckemeyer transferred the case from Scott to Mississippi County, no court ha[d] jurisdiction or authority to transfer the case elsewhere.(FN1) Rule 51.13, Missouri Rules of Civil Procedure (1998), provides: A court which has granted a change of venue shall have the power to annul the order, with the consent of the parties, at any time before the papers or transcript are filed in the court to which the venue was changed. In this case, venue was transferred from Scott to Mississippi County on May 14, 1996. The "papers or transcript" of the case were filed in the Mississippi County Circuit Court on September 25, 1996. The order purporting to set aside the May 14, 1996, order was not entered until August 25, 1998. Thus the order of August 25 was entered approximately two years after the "papers or transcript" of the case were filed in Mississippi County. In addition, the August 25 order was entered without the consent of Relators. The valid(FN2) order transferring venue from Scott to Mississippi County could only be recalled before the papers or transcript were filed in the court of Mississippi County, and then only with the consent of the parties. Rule 51.13. See State ex rel. Schnuck Markets, Inc., 859 S.W.2d at 698; State ex rel. Peabody Coal Co. v. Powell, 574 S.W.2d 423 (Mo. banc 1978). Once venue was properly transferred, no jurisdiction or authority existed to recall or annul the order. State ex rel. Schnuck Markets, Inc., 859 S.W.2d at 698; State ex rel. Peabody Coal Co., 574 S.W.2d at 426. Accordingly, our preliminary writ in mandamus is made absolute. Respondent is ordered to vacate his order of August 25, 1998, and reinstate the original order of May 14, 1996. Preliminary order of mandamus is absolute. Footnotes: FN1.The case was originally assigned to Judge Anthony Heckemeyer. While the case was pending, however, Judge Heckemeyer resigned from the bench. Judge Heckemeyer's successor, Judge David A. Dolan, disqualified himself from the case and Judge William C. Seay of the 42nd Judicial Circuit was transferred by the Supreme Court to hear the case. FN2.No party contests the validity of the original order transferring venue from Scott to Mississippi County.
Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
Samantha Bordas, Appellant, vs. FedEx Freight, Inc. and Division of Employment Security, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2025#ED113329
Jayla Chairse, Appellant, vs. Division of Employment Security, Respondent.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 16, 2025#ED113189
Board of Education of the City of St. Louis, Appellant, vs. Missouri Charter Public School Commission and Missouri State Board of Education, Respondents.(2025)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictApril 22, 2025#ED112985
MARK EDWARD HOOD, Petitioner-Appellant v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictDecember 17, 2024#SD38450
Dana Jensen vs. Division of Employment Security(2024)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictOctober 29, 2024#WD86895