OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Donald Seddens, Defendant-Appellant

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Donald Seddens, Defendant-Appellant Case Number: No. 70848 Handdown Date: 05/13/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. Steven H. Goldman Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and James R. Reinhard and Gary M. Gaertner, JJ. Opinion:

ORDER Defendant appeals the judgment upon his conviction by the court of one count of forcible rape, Section 566.030, RSMo 1994, for which he was sentenced to five years in the custody of the department of corrections. We affirm. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions