OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Larry Caldwell, Defendant-Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Larry Caldwell, Defendant-
Respondent
State of Missouri, Plaintiff-

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Larry Caldwell, Defendant-Appellant. Case Number: No. 70508 Handdown Date: 07/15/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Sherri B. Sullivan Counsel for Appellant: Susan K. Eckles Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, IIII, Assistant Attorney General and Paul M. Rauschenbach, Assistant Attorney General Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Dowd, P.J., and Reinhard and Gaertner, JJ., concur. Opinion:

ORDER Larry Caldwell (Defendant) appeals from his conviction, after a jury trial, for one count of first-degree robbery, Section 569.020, RSMo 1994, and one count of armed criminal action, Section 571.015, RSMo 1994. The trial court sentenced him to concurrent prison terms of twelve years and three years, respectively. Defendant alleges the trial court plainly erred when it did not sua sponte intervene to halt numerous instances of prosecutorial misconduct. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b) Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.