OTT LAW

STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff-Respondent vs. LARRY F. MOORE, Defendant-Appellant

Decision date: December 22, 2008

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

1

STATE OF MISSOURI, ) ) Plaintiff-Respondent ) ) vs. ) No. 28839 ) LARRY F. MOORE, ) Filed: December 22, 2008 ) Defendant-Appellant )

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY

Honorable Michael C. Dawson, Associate Circuit Judge

AFFIRMED

Larry F. Moore (defendant) appeals his conviction for the class C misdemeanor of failure to signal when turning left. § 304.019.1(3) and (4). 1 This court affirms. This case arose out of the same facts as No. 28841. The opinion in that case is filed contemporaneous with the filing of this opinion. Missouri State Highway Patrol Trooper L.D. Stoddard stopped defendant on July 4, 2007, for failure to signal a left turn. Trooper Stoddard observed defendant driving a vehicle that

1 References to statutes are to RSMo 2000.

2 turned from County Road SW 101 in St. Clair County onto County Road SW 476. Defendant did not signal before turning left onto County Road SW 476. The county roads were gravel roads. Defendant presents one point on appeal. He contends the trial court erred in finding him guilty of failing to use his turn signal "because there was no violation of any law in that there is no statutory requirement that an individual must signal an intent to turn on a county gravel road." This issue was decided adverse to defendant in No. 28841. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, defendant's point is denied. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

JOHN E. PARRISH, Judge

Lynch, C.J., and Rahmeyer, J., concur

Appellant's attorney – Stephen W. Angle, Matthew D. Lowe Respondent's attorney – Joleene V. Wood

Related Opinions

Rodney Lee Lincoln, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2014)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 2, 2104#ED100987

affirmed
criminal-lawmajority4,922 words

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080

affirmed

McGregory appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the third degree and property damage in the second degree, raising unpreserved claims of error regarding evidence admissibility and the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund judgment amount. The court affirmed the convictions but modified the CVC judgment amount, finding the trial court entered a judgment in excess of that authorized by law.

criminal-lawper_curiam3,374 words

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. RUSSELL KENNETH CLANCY, Appellant(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictFebruary 25, 2026#SD38782

affirmed

The court affirmed Clancy's conviction for second-degree assault against a special victim after a jury trial. The evidence was sufficient to prove that Clancy punched an elderly civilian in the face and struck a police officer during an altercation at a laundromat, supporting the conviction under Missouri statute § 565.052.3.

criminal-lawper_curiam1,516 words

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. James Willis Peters, Appellant.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101218

remanded

James Willis Peters appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, challenging whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all four of his prior offenses were intoxication-related traffic offenses. The court found the state failed to sufficiently prove his 2002 offense was an IRTO and therefore vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.

criminal-lawper_curiam3,993 words

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Gerald R. Nytes, Appellant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED113261

affirmed

Gerald Nytes appealed his conviction for violating a full order of protection, arguing the State failed to prove he had notice of the order as required by statute. The court affirmed, finding sufficient evidence of notice based on Nytes's presence at the contested order of protection hearing and his subsequent violation through phone calls made from jail to the protected party.

criminal-lawper_curiam1,603 words