Ott Law Firm

State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dennis Bell, Defendant/Appellant.

Decision date: UnknownED81468

Parties & Roles

Judges

Trial Court Judge
Linda Hamlett

Disposition

Dismissed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Dennis Bell, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: ED81468 Handdown Date: 09/10/2002 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Warren County, Hon. Keith Sutherland Counsel for Appellant: Party Acting Pro Se Counsel for Respondent: Michael S. Wright Opinion Summary: Dennis Bell appeals from orders denying his motion to disqualify the circuit judge, denying his motion for change of venue, and appointing Associate Circuit Judge Linda Hamlett. DISMISSED. Division Five holds: There is no final, appealable judgment where no judgment and sentence have been entered and the defendant is merely attempting to appeal from various interlocutory orders. Citation: Opinion Author: Lawrence E. Mooney, Chief Judge Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Crahan and R. Dowd, Jr., JJ., concur. Opinion: Dennis Bell, the defendant, appeals from orders denying his motion to disqualify the circuit judge, denying his motion for change of venue, and appointing Associate Circuit Judge Linda Hamlett. Because there is no final, appealable judgment to invoke this court's jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal. There is no right to an appeal without statutory authority. State v. Williams, 871 S.W.2d 450, 452 (Mo. banc 1994). In criminal cases, a defendant may only appeal in "all cases of final judgment rendered upon any indictment or

information." Section 547.070, RSMo 2000. In addition, a criminal judgment is final for purposes of appeal when the judgment and sentence are entered. State v. Welch, 865 S.W.2d 434, 435 (Mo. App. E.D. 1993). Here, the defendant has never been convicted of a crime and no judgment and sentence have been entered. Rather, he is attempting to appeal from various interlocutory orders entered in his criminal case, which is still pending in the circuit court. Without a final, appealable judgment, this court is without jurisdiction. We have a responsibility to examine our jurisdiction sua sponte. Fischer v. City of Washington, 55 S.W.3d 372, 377 (Mo. App. E.D. 2001). We directed the defendant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed. In his response to the order, the defendant offered no statutory authority to support his appeal. Instead, he asserts it is necessary for this court to review the circuit court's rulings to protect his rights. We note that there may be a method to review a ruling on the disqualification of a judge, but appeal without a final judgment is not one of them. See, e.g., State ex rel. Stubblefield v. Bader, 66 S.W.3d 741 (Mo. banc 2002) (review by petition for writ of prohibition). The appeal is dismissed without prejudice for lack of a final, appealable judgment. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Cases

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080

affirmed

McGregory appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the third degree and property damage in the second degree, raising unpreserved claims of error regarding evidence admissibility and the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund judgment amount. The court affirmed the convictions but modified the CVC judgment amount, finding the trial court entered a judgment in excess of that authorized by law.

Criminal LawCivil Litigationper_curiam3,374 words
Read opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. RUSSELL KENNETH CLANCY, Appellant(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictFebruary 25, 2026#SD38782

affirmed

The court affirmed Clancy's conviction for second-degree assault against a special victim after a jury trial. The evidence was sufficient to prove that Clancy punched an elderly civilian in the face and struck a police officer during an altercation at a laundromat, supporting the conviction under Missouri statute § 565.052.3.

Criminal LawCivil Litigationper_curiam1,516 words
Read opinion

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. James Willis Peters, Appellant.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101218

remanded

James Willis Peters appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, challenging whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all four of his prior offenses were intoxication-related traffic offenses. The court found the state failed to sufficiently prove his 2002 offense was an IRTO and therefore vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.

Criminal LawCivil Litigationper_curiam3,993 words
Read opinion

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Gerald R. Nytes, Appellant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED113261

affirmed

Gerald Nytes appealed his conviction for violating a full order of protection, arguing the State failed to prove he had notice of the order as required by statute. The court affirmed, finding sufficient evidence of notice based on Nytes's presence at the contested order of protection hearing and his subsequent violation through phone calls made from jail to the protected party.

Read opinion

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Deandre D. Walton, Appellant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED112976

affirmed

Appellant Deandre Walton appealed his convictions for two counts of first-degree murder, two counts of armed criminal action, and unlawful possession of a firearm, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements and admitting evidence of his statements at trial. The appellate court affirmed the convictions, finding no error in the trial court's denial of the suppression motion.

Criminal LawCivil Litigationper_curiam1,670 words
Read opinion