State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Eddie Lee Douglas, Defendant/Appellant. Eddie Lee Douglas, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Eddie Lee Douglas, Defendant/Appellant. Eddie Lee Douglas, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent. Case Number: Nos. 68122 & 70366 Handdown Date: 06/10/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Francois County, Hon. Kenneth W. Pratte Counsel for Appellant: Counsel for Respondent: Opinion Summary: Citation: Opinion Author: Per Curiam Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and Gary M. Gaertner and Mary Rhodes Russell, JJ. Opinion:

O R D E R Defendant appeals after he was convicted by a jury of one count of receiving stolen property, section 570.080, RSMo 1986, and one count of altering or removing item numbers, section 570.085, RSMo 1986. The court found Defendant to be a prior offender and sentenced him to a seven-year prison term for receiving stolen property and a concurrent five-year term for altering or removing item numbers. Both sentences were ordered to run consecutively to Defendant's prior unrelated sentence. Defendant also appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit; the judgment of the motion court is

based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.