OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Orson L. Wells, Jr., Defendant/Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
Orson L. Wells, Jr., Defendant/
Respondent
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Orson L. Wells, Jr., Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: 71165 Handdown Date: 11/25/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. Floyd McBride, Jr. Counsel for Appellant: Gwenda R. Robinson Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris, III, and David R. Truman Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Crane, P.J., Rhodes Russell and James R. Dowd, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Defendant appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of robbery in the first degree, in violation of Section 569.020 RSMo (1994); one count of attempted robbery in the first degree, in violation of Section 564.011 RSMo (1994); and three counts of armed criminal action, in violation of Section 571.015 RSMo (1994), for the robbery and attempted robbery of various individuals in one neighborhood over a one week period. The trial court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to consecutive terms of life imprisonment on each of Counts I and IV, robbery in the first degree; ten years imprisonment on each of Counts III, V, and VII, armed criminal action; and twenty years imprisonment on Count VI, attempted robbery in the first degree. No error of law appears and no jurisprudential purpose would be served with a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.