State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, vs. Robert A. Dunn, Defendant/Appellant.
Decision date: August 19, 2014ED101101
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- Robert A. Dunn, Defendant/
- Respondent
- State of Missouri, Plaintiff/
Judges
- Trial Court Judge
- Lisa Van Amburg
Disposition
Dismissed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
STATE OF MISSOURI, ) No. ED101101 ) Plaintiff/Respondent, ) ) vs. ) Appeal from the Circuit Court ) of St. Charles County ROBERT A. DUNN, ) No. 1311-CR03752-01 ) Defendant/Appellant. ) Filed: August 19, 2014 )
Robert A. Dunn (Appellant) was convicted of driving while intoxicated. The trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed Appellant on probation for two years. Appellant has now filed a notice of appeal from the judgment of conviction. This Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed. Appellant did not file a response. We dismiss the appeal. In criminal appeals, section 547.070, RSMo 2000, limits the right of appeal to final judgments. In criminal cases, a judgment is final for purposes of appeal when the judgment and sentence are entered. State v. Welch, 865 S.W.2d 434, 435 (Mo. App. E.D. 1993). However, where imposition of sentence is not entered, but is suspended, the judgment is not final and a defendant may not appeal it. State v. Lynch, 679 S.W.2d 858, 860 (Mo. banc 1984); See also, State v. Larson, 79 S.W.3d 891 (Mo. banc 2002). Because the trial court suspended imposition of sentence, there is no final, appealable judgment.
2 Where no final, appealable judgment exists, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal. State v. Moore, 352 S.W.3d 392, 398 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011). Therefore, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice for lack of a final, appealable judgment.
__________________________________ ANGELA T. QUIGLESS, CHIEF JUDGE
Lisa Van Amburg, J., and Philip M. Hess, J., Concur.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 547.070cited
section 547.070, RSMo
Cases
- state v larson 79 sw3d 891cited
State v. Larson, 79 S.W.3d 891
- state v lynch 679 sw2d 858cited
State v. Lynch, 679 S.W.2d 858
- state v moore 352 sw3d 392cited
State v. Moore, 352 S.W.3d 392
- state v welch 865 sw2d 434cited
State v. Welch, 865 S.W.2d 434
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, vs. Robert B. Bone, Defendant/Appellant.(2014)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictSeptember 30, 2014#ED101898
State of Missouri, Respondent v. Donald R. Ham, Appellant.(2002)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED81695
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Brian K. Hubbard, Defendant/Appellant.(2008)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED90620
State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Eric Hotze, Defendant/Appellant(2008)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED90531
St. Louis County, Missouri, Respondent, v. Frank Hooper, Jr., Appellant.(2002)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District#ED81614