State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Robin Thomson, Defendant/Appellant.
Decision date: UnknownED84524
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. Robin Thomson, Defendant/Appellant. Case Number: ED84524 Handdown Date: 09/28/2004 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Scotland County, Hon. Karl Demarce Counsel for Appellant: Thomas J. Keedy Counsel for Respondent: Hugh S. Summers Opinion Summary: Robin Thomson appeals from the court's judgment of conviction for third-degree domestic assault pursuant to section 558.016.8, RSMo Supp. 2004. DISMISSED. Division Five holds: Where Thomson's notice of appeal was untimely, because it was filed more than 10 days after he was sentenced, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider his appeal. Citation: Opinion Author: George W. Draper III, Chief Judge Opinion Vote: DISMISSED. Crahan and Norton, JJ., concur. Opinion: Robin Thomson (Defendant) appeals from the trial court's judgment of conviction for third degree domestic assault pursuant to section 558.016.8, RSMo Supp. 2004. Defendant's notice of appeal is untimely, the appeal is dismissed. The State charged Defendant with third degree domestic assault, a misdemeanor under section 558.016.8. On October 20, 2003, a jury returned a verdict of guilty, which was accepted by the trial court. The court deferred
sentencing until March 4, 2004. On that date, the court sentenced Defendant to six months in the Clark County Jail, but suspended execution of the sentence and placed him on probation for two years. Subsequently, on April 2, 2004, Defendant filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied as untimely. Defendant filed a notice of appeal to this Court on May 5, 2004. This Court has a duty to determine its jurisdiction sua sponte. State v. Bain , 982 S.W.2d 706, 707 (Mo. App. E.D. 1998). Under Rule 30.01(d), a notice of appeal in a criminal case is due no later than ten days after the judgment becomes final. A judgment is "final" in a criminal case when the sentence is entered. State v. Williams , 871 S.W.2d 450, 452 (Mo. banc 1994). Here, the trial court sentenced Defendant on March 4, 2004. Therefore, his notice of appeal was due on Monday, March 15, 2004. Rule 30.10(d); Rule 20.01(a). Defendant filed his notice of appeal on May 5, 2004, well outside the time limits of Rule 30.01(d). Defendant filed an untimely motion for new trial after he was sentenced. Rule 29.11 provides that motion for new trial must be filed within 15 days after the return of the verdict. State v. Brock , 113 S.W.3d 227, 234 (Mo. App. E.D. 2003). Here, Defendant filed his motion for new trial after his sentencing and after the trial court had lost jurisdiction over his case. This untimely motion did not extend the time for filing a notice of appeal. (FN1) We issued an order directing Defendant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed. Defendant filed a response indicating he had no good cause and conceding the appeal should be dismissed. Appeal dismissed. Footnotes: FN1. In a civil case, the motion for new trial is filed after the judgment is entered and could extend the time for filing a notice of appeal. Rules 81.04(a) & 81.05(a). However, these rules do not apply in a criminal case. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Related Opinions
Rodney Lee Lincoln, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2014)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 2, 2104#ED100987
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080
McGregory appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the third degree and property damage in the second degree, raising unpreserved claims of error regarding evidence admissibility and the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund judgment amount. The court affirmed the convictions but modified the CVC judgment amount, finding the trial court entered a judgment in excess of that authorized by law.
STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. RUSSELL KENNETH CLANCY, Appellant(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictFebruary 25, 2026#SD38782
The court affirmed Clancy's conviction for second-degree assault against a special victim after a jury trial. The evidence was sufficient to prove that Clancy punched an elderly civilian in the face and struck a police officer during an altercation at a laundromat, supporting the conviction under Missouri statute § 565.052.3.
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. James Willis Peters, Appellant.(2026)
Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101218
James Willis Peters appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, challenging whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all four of his prior offenses were intoxication-related traffic offenses. The court found the state failed to sufficiently prove his 2002 offense was an IRTO and therefore vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.
State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Gerald R. Nytes, Appellant.(2026)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED113261
Gerald Nytes appealed his conviction for violating a full order of protection, arguing the State failed to prove he had notice of the order as required by statute. The court affirmed, finding sufficient evidence of notice based on Nytes's presence at the contested order of protection hearing and his subsequent violation through phone calls made from jail to the protected party.