OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles Barnes, Appellant. Charles Barnes, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Decision date: Unknown

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles Barnes, Appellant. Charles Barnes, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent. Case Number: 69626 and 72094 Handdown Date: 11/25/1997 Appeal From: Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Hon. John F. Kintz Counsel for Appellant: Rosalynn Koch Counsel for Respondent: Breck Burgess Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Ahrens, P.J., Crandall and Karohl, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Opinion modified by Court's own motion on January 6, 1998. This substitution does not constitute a new opinion. Defendant, Charles Barnes, appeals from his judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree. He was sentenced as a prior offender to imprisonment for fifteen years. Defendant also appeals from the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion without an evidentiary hearing. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion on defendant=s direct appeal. The judgment of conviction is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b). The judgment of the trial court on defendant=s Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is

affirmed. Rule 84.16(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions