State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles Sanders, Appellant.

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Charles Sanders, Appellant. Case Number: 54416 Handdown Date: 02/24/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Jackson County, Hon. Edith L. Messina Counsel for Appellant: A. Renae Adamson Counsel for Respondent: Elizabeth L. Ziegler Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Denvir Stith, P.J., Hanna and Riederer, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER Mr. Sanders appeals his convictions for first degree robbery and armed criminal action. He claims that the motion court plainly erred in failing to, sua sponte, declare a mistrial when the prosecutor, during closing argument, made statements which Mr. Sanders suggests were improper personal epithets and which improperly invoked fears of Mr. Sanders' propensity to commit future crimes. Because we disagree with Mr. Sanders' interpretation of the nature and effect of the prosecutor's remarks, and finding no precedential value to our decision, we affirm by this summary order. We have provided the parties with a memorandum setting out the reasons for our decision. Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.