Ott Law Firm

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Donald J. Ellison, Appellant

Decision date: UnknownWD66013

Parties & Roles

Disposition

Transferred

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Researching a similar criminal law issue?

This archive page is for legal research. For a practical overview of claims, deadlines, evidence, and next steps, start with the related practice page.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Donald J. Ellison, Appellant Case Number: WD66013 Handdown Date: 04/17/2007 Appeal From: Circuit Court of Livingston County, Hon. Warren L. McElwain, Judge Counsel for Appellant: Craig A. Johnston Counsel for Respondent: Shaun J. Mackelprang Opinion Summary: Donald Ellison appeals his conviction for the class A felony of child molestation in the first degree pursuant to section 566.067, RSMo 2000. He argues that section 566.025, RSMo, is unconstitutional. TRANSFERRED TO SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI Division holds: Ellison directly attacks the constitutionality of section 566.025, therefore, this court does not have jurisdiction pursuant to article III, section 3 of the Missouri Constitution. Accordingly, the case is transferred to the Supreme Court of Missouri for adjudication. Citation: Opinion Author: Harold L. Lowenstein, Judge Opinion Vote: TRANSFERRED TO THE SUPREME COURT. Ulrich, P.J., and Smart, JJ. Opinion: Donald Ellison appeals his conviction for the class A felony of child molestation in the first degree pursuant to

Section 566.067, RSMo 2000. The briefs have been filed and argument heard on this matter. Appellant raises three points. Appeal from point three is manifestly without merit in its challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence. Ellison's appeal is a direct attack on the constitutionality of Section 566.025 RSMo. 2000. As the appellant challenges the constitutionality of Section 566.025, this court determines that it does not have jurisdiction pursuant to Article III, Section 3 of the Missouri Constitution. Accordingly, this case is transferred to the Supreme Court of Missouri for adjudication. Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Related Opinions

Other opinions in the same practice area.

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080

affirmed

McGregory appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the third degree and property damage in the second degree, raising unpreserved claims of error regarding evidence admissibility and the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund judgment amount. The court affirmed the convictions but modified the CVC judgment amount, finding the trial court entered a judgment in excess of that authorized by law.

Criminal LawCivil Litigationper_curiam3,374 words
Read opinion

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. RUSSELL KENNETH CLANCY, Appellant(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictFebruary 25, 2026#SD38782

affirmed

The court affirmed Clancy's conviction for second-degree assault against a special victim after a jury trial. The evidence was sufficient to prove that Clancy punched an elderly civilian in the face and struck a police officer during an altercation at a laundromat, supporting the conviction under Missouri statute § 565.052.3.

Criminal LawCivil Litigationper_curiam1,516 words
Read opinion

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. James Willis Peters, Appellant.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101218

remanded

James Willis Peters appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, challenging whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all four of his prior offenses were intoxication-related traffic offenses. The court found the state failed to sufficiently prove his 2002 offense was an IRTO and therefore vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.

Criminal LawCivil Litigationper_curiam3,993 words
Read opinion

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Gerald R. Nytes, Appellant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED113261

affirmed

Gerald Nytes appealed his conviction for violating a full order of protection, arguing the State failed to prove he had notice of the order as required by statute. The court affirmed, finding sufficient evidence of notice based on Nytes's presence at the contested order of protection hearing and his subsequent violation through phone calls made from jail to the protected party.

Read opinion

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Deandre D. Walton, Appellant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED112976

affirmed

Appellant Deandre Walton appealed his convictions for two counts of first-degree murder, two counts of armed criminal action, and unlawful possession of a firearm, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements and admitting evidence of his statements at trial. The appellate court affirmed the convictions, finding no error in the trial court's denial of the suppression motion.

Criminal LawCivil Litigationper_curiam1,670 words
Read opinion