OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Howard Dunaway, Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Western District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Howard Dunaway, Appellant. Case Number: No. 52225 Handdown Date: 09/30/1997 Appeal From: Jackson County Circuit Court, Hon. Ronald R. Holliger Counsel for Appellant: Robert G. Duncan Counsel for Respondent: Philip M. Koppe Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM. Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Before Stith, P.J., Breckenridge and Hanna, J.J. Opinion: Howard Dunaway appeals from his conviction for first degree murder, for which he was sentenced to life imprisonment without the possibility of probation or parole. Mr. Dunaway raises five points on appeal. First, he claims that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress his statements and admitting incriminating testimonial evidence obtained in violation of his Miranda rights. As his second point on appeal, Mr. Dunaway contends that the trial court abused its discretion by admitting gruesome photographs of the victim into evidence. Third, he claims that the trial court erred in admitting testimony of the victim's wife because that testimony constituted inadmissible hearsay. For his fourth point, Mr. Dunaway alleges that the trial court erred by allowing the State to argue that the jury must find Mr. Dunaway not guilty of first degree murder before the jury could consider second degree murder. Finally, Mr. Dunaway argues that the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. This court finds that Mr. Dunaway's claims of error are without merit. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Related Opinions

Rodney Lee Lincoln, Appellant, vs. State of Missouri, Respondent.(2014)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictDecember 2, 2104#ED100987

affirmed
criminal-lawmajority4,922 words

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. James McGregory, Appellant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictMarch 10, 2026#ED113080

affirmed

McGregory appealed his convictions for domestic assault in the third degree and property damage in the second degree, raising unpreserved claims of error regarding evidence admissibility and the Crime Victims' Compensation Fund judgment amount. The court affirmed the convictions but modified the CVC judgment amount, finding the trial court entered a judgment in excess of that authorized by law.

criminal-lawper_curiam3,374 words

STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent v. RUSSELL KENNETH CLANCY, Appellant(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictFebruary 25, 2026#SD38782

affirmed

The court affirmed Clancy's conviction for second-degree assault against a special victim after a jury trial. The evidence was sufficient to prove that Clancy punched an elderly civilian in the face and struck a police officer during an altercation at a laundromat, supporting the conviction under Missouri statute § 565.052.3.

criminal-lawper_curiam1,516 words

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. James Willis Peters, Appellant.(2026)

Supreme Court of MissouriFebruary 24, 2026#SC101218

remanded

James Willis Peters appealed his conviction for driving while intoxicated as a chronic offender, challenging whether the state proved beyond a reasonable doubt that all four of his prior offenses were intoxication-related traffic offenses. The court found the state failed to sufficiently prove his 2002 offense was an IRTO and therefore vacated the judgment and remanded for resentencing.

criminal-lawper_curiam3,993 words

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Deandre D. Walton, Appellant.(2026)

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern DistrictFebruary 17, 2026#ED112976

affirmed

Appellant Deandre Walton appealed his convictions for two counts of first-degree murder, two counts of armed criminal action, and unlawful possession of a firearm, arguing the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress statements and admitting evidence of his statements at trial. The appellate court affirmed the convictions, finding no error in the trial court's denial of the suppression motion.

criminal-lawper_curiam1,670 words