State of Missouri, Respondent, v. John DeClue, Appellant.
Decision date: Unknown
Parties & Roles
- Appellant
- John DeClue
- Respondent
- State of Missouri
Disposition
Affirmed
Slip Opinion Notice
This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Opinion
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. John DeClue, Appellant. Case Number: 72985 Handdown Date: 08/11/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. James R. Dowd Counsel for Appellant: Raymund J. Capelovitch Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Pudlowski, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Ahrens, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER John Declue (Defendant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury convicted him of first degree murder, section 565.020, RSMo 1994, first degree robbery, section 569.020, RSMo 1994, and two counts of armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. Further, there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None
This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.
Authorities Cited
Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.
Statutes
- RSMo § 565.020cited
section 565.020, RSMo
- RSMo § 569.020cited
section 569.020, RSMo
- RSMo § 571.015cited
section 571.015, RSMo
Rules
- Rule 30.25cited
Rule 30.25
Cases
- state v grim 854 sw2d 403cited
State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403
Related Opinions
Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arlandus Keyes, Defendant/Appellant. and Arlandus Keyes, Defendant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.(1998)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Tony D. Jones vs. Missouri Department of Corrections(2019)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western DistrictSeptember 17, 2019#WD82678
Ivle Ray Matney, Jr., Movant-Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent-Respondent.(2003)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern DistrictMarch 30, 2001
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Russell E. Bucklew, Appellant.(1998)
Supreme Court of Missouri
State of Missouri, Respondent, v. John L. Sanders, Appellant(1997)
Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
State of Missouri, Respondent v. Ronald Hampton, Jr., Appellant.(2005)
Supreme Court of Missouri#SC86417