OTT LAW

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. John DeClue, Appellant.

Decision date: Unknown

Parties & Roles

Appellant
John DeClue
Respondent
State of Missouri

Disposition

Affirmed

Slip Opinion Notice

This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Opinion

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court. Opinion Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District Case Style: State of Missouri, Respondent, v. John DeClue, Appellant. Case Number: 72985 Handdown Date: 08/11/1998 Appeal From: Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Hon. James R. Dowd Counsel for Appellant: Raymund J. Capelovitch Counsel for Respondent: John M. Morris Opinion Summary: None Citation: Opinion Author: PER CURIAM Opinion Vote: AFFIRMED. Pudlowski, P.J., Crandall, Jr., and Ahrens, J.J., concur. Opinion: ORDER John Declue (Defendant) appeals from the trial court's judgment entered after a jury convicted him of first degree murder, section 565.020, RSMo 1994, first degree robbery, section 569.020, RSMo 1994, and two counts of armed criminal action, section 571.015, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. Further, there is sufficient evidence from which a reasonable juror might find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Grim, 854 S.W.2d 403, 405 (Mo. banc 1993). An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). Separate Opinion: None

This slip opinion is subject to revision and may not reflect the final opinion adopted by the Court.

Authorities Cited

Statutes, rules, and cases referenced in this opinion.

Statutes

Rules

Cases

Related Opinions

Cases sharing legal topics and authorities with this opinion.